Brian Legge
Veteran
I recently picked up an older Ricoh 500 and shot my first roll with it. To be honest, I mostly picked it up as an ergonomic experiment; I was curious about the lever winding on the bottom would work for me.
In practice, the camera just felt a little large in my hands so I doubt I'll hold on to it, but the lens makes letting go a challenge. I was surprised by both the sharpness and the general rendering quality I got out of the lens, particularly given how little I've seen about it and its low cost.
Here are a few initial shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870003089
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870003267
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870616698
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870616272
In practice, the camera just felt a little large in my hands so I doubt I'll hold on to it, but the lens makes letting go a challenge. I was surprised by both the sharpness and the general rendering quality I got out of the lens, particularly given how little I've seen about it and its low cost.
Here are a few initial shots:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870003089

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870003267

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870616698

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cannelbrae/4870616272
btgc
Veteran
There were times when one had to hunt to find bad camera, I rationalize. I use Five-One-Nine - bottom wind lever and focusing ears are handy. I like rectangular shape with cut corners. Think before you let it go.
PMCC
Late adopter.
There's a lot to like about the Ricoh 500 and Five-One-Nine. The bottom wind is not just an over-leveraged add-on, but completely integrated into the design of the camera and thus a smooth and elegant mechanism. The dual ears on opposite sides of the focusing ring are ergonomically superior to the usual single finger-tip lever, and the viewfinder with brightlines and parallax indicators (latter on 5-1-9 only) is bright and snappy to focus. The Five-One-Nine's 45mm/1.9 lens -- a 5 or 6 element design -- is superior to the 500's basic but capable 45mm/2.8. Both equipped with a Seikosha MXL shutter (1 -1/500 +B), very solid all metal construction and engraved markings throughout. It takes $20 - $80 (thin market, erratic prices) to pick one of these up -- a little more than pocket change for a classic meterless fixed RF with cool mechanical features. Lots of fun to shoot, with very good performance.
Last edited:
paulfish4570
Veteran
I am thinking it is a keeper, Brian.
Armoured
Well-known
I'm increasingly thinking the Ricoh lenses are perhaps the most underrated out there. And the cameras are no slouches either.
btgc
Veteran
I like some of Ricoh SLR lenses, too. Some of them are rebranded makes from other makers and other seem to be Ricoh's own brews.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I LOVE that first photo.
zosta
Member
I love it too.
Very sharp.
Some sample of Neopan 400@800 in HC110
F16 rule.
Very sharp.
Some sample of Neopan 400@800 in HC110
F16 rule.



shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Brian, this one is a winner
Ricoh knows how to make a good lens for sure.
And I personally think they rival Olympus in terms of coming up with weird/out-of-the-box designs.
Brian Legge
Veteran
Thanks. As I wasn't using the camera much due to ergonomic differences between us, I sold it. I think the buyer was just looking for an interesting decoration though - I found that out after the fact. Sad as the results from the camera were wonderful.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.