bmattock
Veteran
Open specs are better than closed ones, so for that, yes, Adobe is far better than yet another proprietary RAW format!
And as I mentioned earlier - I'm not mad - sorry if it seems that way. I must come across really bombastic; my apologies. I am just emphatic - but I guess it's hard to see a smile on my face when you just read what I'm typing.
My disappointment stems from the fact that I really WANT what Ricoh seemed to be promising - and even on a very limited budget, I would have considered scrimping and saving or selling off some kit to afford one. But not this one - it just isn't what it should and could be.
I'm not attacking digital - I really want it to be better. And I refuse to make allowances and apologies or to try to deflect criticism. Digital has to stand and take its knocks - it does so many things better than film, but not all, not yet. If the market dictates that it is going to replace film, then fine - but it needs to get better faster. My 2 cents.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
And as I mentioned earlier - I'm not mad - sorry if it seems that way. I must come across really bombastic; my apologies. I am just emphatic - but I guess it's hard to see a smile on my face when you just read what I'm typing.
My disappointment stems from the fact that I really WANT what Ricoh seemed to be promising - and even on a very limited budget, I would have considered scrimping and saving or selling off some kit to afford one. But not this one - it just isn't what it should and could be.
I'm not attacking digital - I really want it to be better. And I refuse to make allowances and apologies or to try to deflect criticism. Digital has to stand and take its knocks - it does so many things better than film, but not all, not yet. If the market dictates that it is going to replace film, then fine - but it needs to get better faster. My 2 cents.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks