gb hill
Veteran
I know there was a thread on 1+100 in Rodinal a month or so ago. A Flickr contact who happens to live a few counties from me has been doing stand development with Rodinal 1+200. His progress is amazing! You can really stretch this stuff out & get very good results! I don't wish to copy his photos, so here is a link to his flickr. You can immediately see some of his 1+200 developing technique as well as 1+100 stand developing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/holdenrichards/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/holdenrichards/
robklurfield
eclipse
greg, thanks for sharing the link. his work is beautiful. I've been doing 1:100, so I'm really curious what he's doing.
larmarv916
Well-known
My question is ..... I did not see a clear statement of development times. I do stand development on different developers, and normally 53-55 min. Is about average. I would think that 1-200 we require really long development times. Nice results.
gb hill
Veteran
Page 3 is about where he started with his 1+200 stand development with rodinal. Check out the one shot where he used a 1+300 dilution of rodinal! Amazing stuff but I think that's pushing the limit. But if anyone will get the technique down Holden will. BTW holden just started doing his own developing a few years ago!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/holdenrichards/page3/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/holdenrichards/page3/
ferider
Veteran
you need about 3ml per 35mm roll. Not sure about 120. 1:100 or 1:200 will depend on your tank and not create much difference. When it's gone, it's gone. Not much happens after 30'.
My 2 cents.
My 2 cents.
gb hill
Veteran
My question is ..... I did not see a clear statement of development times. I do stand development on different developers, and normally 53-55 min. Is about average. I would think that 1-200 we require really long development times. Nice results.
I don't know his times either, but seems he posted it in one of his photos. I'm thinking 2 hrs? can't remember. I'll see if I can find it!....edit, check the discussions out!
http://www.flickr.com/groups/highdilution/
Last edited:
gb hill
Veteran
That sounds like HC110. Don't know about rodinal. Here is the link to his experimental 1+300 (1.6ml to 500ml) stand dev. Perhaps you don't need this much time. 3 hrs? Has anyone here tried 30 minuet stand development? Why 1 hr for 1+100? I don't think I have heard an explanation why!you need about 3ml per 35mm roll. Not sure about 120. 1:100 or 1:200 will depend on your tank and not create much difference. When it's gone, it's gone. Not much happens after 30'.
My 2 cents.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/holdenrichards/4499936962/
FrankS
Registered User
Just a few days ago I souped 5 rolls of FP4+ in Rodinal about 1:75 for 30minutes, with 1 minute of initial agitation, then 10 sec of agitation at about 20 minute mark. They came out great.
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
The longer I develop film, the more I think that Rodinal is some kind of miracle. It practically always works no matter how badly you screw it up.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
I do use 1:200 Rodinal with films like tech Pan and Fuji Minicopy II. Usua;;y 120 min stand development. I suspect that the trick is to leave it in the "soup" for long enough to ensure that it is exhausted - if that takes 90-100 min - the next 20 or so minutes will not make a difference. I have tried it with APX 25, rated at 80 - also @ 120 min/1:200. OK. but a bit thinner than I like.
I used to do Tech Pan/ SO 115 120, rated at 8 asa and in Rodinal 1:200 for 120-150 min, just a quick flip of the tank mid-way (60-75 min). Very high resolution, decent - but by no means perfect grey scale (blocked low values) - but as it was done for aerial stuff - detail was critical.
Could be interesting with some of the new, thin emulsion films (Maco/Efke etc).
I used to do Tech Pan/ SO 115 120, rated at 8 asa and in Rodinal 1:200 for 120-150 min, just a quick flip of the tank mid-way (60-75 min). Very high resolution, decent - but by no means perfect grey scale (blocked low values) - but as it was done for aerial stuff - detail was critical.
Could be interesting with some of the new, thin emulsion films (Maco/Efke etc).
btgc
Veteran
Sorry, I'm stepping aside...but this thread again is temptation. Is LC29 appropriate for stand development? I normally use Neopan/Legacy and APX films, ISO 400 and sometimes ISO 100.
Well, I can just try myself and see results, just in case anyone is already doing this?
Well, I can just try myself and see results, just in case anyone is already doing this?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.