Rokkor 40/2 vs. Canon 35/2 LTM

micromoogman

Well-known
Local time
5:28 AM
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
440
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
Have both but I only need one of them. I thought let's keep the best... Took a couple of pics with a NEX-5 and a M-adapter. I can't really tell which is sharper or has the best resolution and constrast. At infinity the Rokkor seems better and at one meter the Canon might be the winner.

For pics look further down...
 
Last pictures and conclusion. Rokkor has better detail in corners. It vignettes more than Canon at f2. Canon has better coating (dampens the stray light and reflections better) and better center resolution. At f5.6 both are very good.

Canon 35mm f2

canon_f2_20.jpg


Rokkor 40mm f2
rokkor_f2_20.jpg
 
What Raid said. I also have both, and would sell another lens before parting w/ either of these. I agree that the Canon 35/2.0 is sharper overall, but I like the microcontrast on the Rokkor 40 and I also like the 40 fov.

OP: I agree w/ backalley that your photos are too large to easily load and see. Could you try reducing the file size of each photo somewhat and reposting?
 
One option is to embed smaller sized images into the thread and to post a link for large sized images for people who want o carefully inspect a very large image.
 
Back
Top Bottom