Rollei Scanfilm CN 400

grainhound

Well-known
Local time
4:52 PM
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
299
Location
Toronto
I won 5 rolls of Rollei Scanfilm CN 400 at the Montreal meet-up over the May long weekend. Three rolls of 120, & two 36 exp rolls of 135, all of which is more useful than a rapidwinder for me. (How’s that working, Frank?) I did a half baked test with my Mamiya 330, figuring that with only 12 shots, I could do it in less than a month. I’m not sure they’ll be of much use to anyone, but I’ve posted 5 shots on flickr - because it’s a lot easier to post there. No resizing, for example.
These are not great shots & I got cheaper scans. 3 of the shots are much too clearly digitized, & I almost left them out because the digital mess interferes with what you can see. The desaturated colour shows, however. The two trees at the Beach shot is my fav of the 12, & I may get it enlarged, but the scan is terrible. It seems that leaves against a light sky makes a mess of jaggies, especially when you don’t pay for a more expensive scan. The unexpected look of the sky - it was actually fairly dull - made it worth including.
This seems to be a film for special purposes; the net has more info for those interested.

The shots are here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/33955951@N00/
 
The film looks good for scanning. I'm trying to scan some Portra 400 vc now and having a hard time.

Maybe I'll try the Rollei.
 
Thardy said:
The film looks good for scanning. I'm trying to scan some Portra 400 vc now and having a hard time.

Maybe I'll try the Rollei.

It's expensive apparently, so before you try it you should click on this: http://www.flickr.com/groups/ishootfilm/discuss/72157600099819576/
Scroll down in this link to another link to more shots taken with it.

I won mine (nice!) so it's great for free... At the reported $10 per roll, you may have a different opinion. There are complaints about it being grainy & unsharp which I don't see, but I shot 120 in the Mamiya. My lab (Colourgenics in Toronto) didn't experience the problems reported in flickr either. I just don't like the small size. I've added one more shot, which seems to have the top of the photo on the bottom of the scan. I'll pay more for a better scan in future.

Haven't used the Mamiya for a while; glad a new film got me back to it.
 
Back
Top Bottom