RedLion
Come to the Faire
For portraits
For portraits
Yes, I did use flash on these, and yes I agree - for the portrait shots, I should have used my Tele Rolleiflex for the more flattering compression and isolation. BUT for some reason, I'm really enjoying shooting portraits with a wide-angle lens. I like getting more of the environment in the shot, but I recognize that with a wide I need to be more aware of everything - especially all the crowds and those tree branches.
Joe
For portraits
Yes, I did use flash on these, and yes I agree - for the portrait shots, I should have used my Tele Rolleiflex for the more flattering compression and isolation. BUT for some reason, I'm really enjoying shooting portraits with a wide-angle lens. I like getting more of the environment in the shot, but I recognize that with a wide I need to be more aware of everything - especially all the crowds and those tree branches.
Joe
I think this is one example where aggressive post processing can salvage so so snap shots. The ideal camera/lens should have been something that can isolate the interesting subjects from the distracting background. I think the FW was the wrong choice; I would use a wide angle only if the background is interesting.
thompsonks
Well-known
Also I wonder if these were by any chance shot on Ektar negative film? It always produces unnatural color. If that's what this is, then maybe try Portra?
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
Here is an FW shot..............

Share: