DNG
Film Friendly
That's correct (no difference in post). Also, if you pixel peep, the cron is a bit sharper in the corners. But then again, for portraits, the Nikkor "center punch" is useful, IMO. Here is for size comparison (ignore Bertha on the right). Earlier Summicrons are bigger and heavier.
![]()
Roland.
Thanks for comparison... I favor the Nikkor size, may allow a slower SS at f/2-f2.8 without flash
Nice overall effect.. beautiful subtle tonesSome more:
@ f4:
@ f2:
![]()
Will upload some 105mm samples later as well.
2 f/2 examples, 1st from the Nikon RF verson, 2nd from the LTM version.
![]()
http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe/2587222988/
![]()
http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe/2480742623/
Nice handalling of contrast range on the color above.. great tonal range in the BW statue
My better half with the Nikkor:
![]()
Kids on a fire engine:
![]()
Nice details... hair, threading etc.
One of my colleagues, chrome version (the lens...)
Tmas
I had been in the same dilmena, but Nikkors are a wee cheaper. Summicron 90 start at $500, but you can find Nikkors for $300.
Here are some examples of the LTM, used with adapter on a M3.
f/2, Portra 400NC:
![]()
f/2 , Ultra Color 400:
![]()
f/2.8, Neopan 1600:
![]()
Very nice Details and colors.. love the 1600 image.. didn't think 1600 was that clean and detailed..... what did you develop it in...
This one was shot at 5.6 - a little outside your range. But I'll post it anyway. From an 85 that I picked up recently for $250 off ebay.
![]()
Great portrait...WOW...