ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
Even my 21-year-old daughter has begun to show signs of interest... 🙂
Chris
Chris
There are other forces driving this resurgence as well. Digital = disposable. And for a generation facing the very real possibility of capitalist induced global catastrophe, one might argue that it is a sort of protest to be reusing a robust product that already exists in the ecosystem instead of buying a new product that requires a much larger draw of resources and manufacturing to produce, only to have it stop working or become outdated tech in a few months time. Not to mention that photography is a ridiculously expensive hobby and if you are not monetizing it for personal gain then generally one cannot afford to be upgrading constantly. For the young generation of photogs this is particularly true, as millenials have less money than any gen before them and they exist in a precipitous ecenomic climate. Film gear is an attractivly low priced "upgrade" or entry point into their chosen hobby.
Seriously doubt shooters are making a film choice for political reasons.
Yeah, I doubt it's political. Just another cool thing for urban young people to congregate around. […]
I've prepared a batch of files to get printed but have a few uncovered months indeed.I was talking to a young photographer at a camera store specializing in used film cameras. He has several 35mm camera bodies and lots of lenses, and a medium format setup as well. He shoots film, but has never made a print. He has his film developed and scanned and posts his images on the web. I wonder how prevalent that is? It's hard to for me to get my head around it.
Early on people complained about the toxicity of film and processes (which to a justified extent decades ago was significant) was just so really bad. Infact, digital has a lot of "shadow" environmental effects. Outsourcing and the social impact may be argued, as the later era had outsourcing to Thailand, China, etc.it's one of the primary reasons i continue to incorporate film in my work. i have seen, with my own eyes, the impact of digital mass consumption in places like the eastern DRC and it isn't pretty. not a blanket statement... just my own reasoning.
My fifteen year old grand daughter is about to start a high school photography course. She asked if she could borrow a 35mm manual camera. I handed her a 43 year old SRT101 I purchased before her mom was born. She asked "why is it so heavy?" I explained the difference between a precision long lasting quality instrument built of steel vs. a short lived device made from "high quailty polycarbonate." "Wow, this feels good, I like this" she said.
My wife and I took a recent cruise on the Rhine River. Most of the cameras were of the smart phone variety. I admit to taking a D90 but in my bag there was an M3 and many rolls of Delta100. The D90 stayed in the bag most of the trip. Another passenger was using an F3. We bacame photog buddies. He is a retired newspaper photographer from a major midwestern news paper. He ditched digital as soon as he retired from the paper and now only shoots film for himself. Like many of us who grew up on film and went digital, he never became comfortable with the medium because, "when the camera is smarter than the operator, the operator soon forgets how to be a real photographer." That is why I am glad my grand daughter is learning with a manual SLR, TRI-X and not a computer that takes pictures.
I am glad you saw that in Palm Spring, you did not see me with my Leica M5. It was raining like crazy. I understand president Obama flight into Palms Spring on Friday was re-routed to March AF Base in Riverside. I was along the main drag (111) taking shots at the cloud formations, they were unbelievable. Regarding the switch to film by many, it produces a bad feeling every time a "new and better" computer (read it DSLR or Digital RF) comes out and you want to upgrade. It creates a good second hand market for those cameras, but it feels like you are always behind. But with a Canon P RF, you do not notice the changes, and you can take as many shots as you want without feeling left behind.
My 13-year-old granddaughter is very much into the "retro," whether that be typewriters, fountain pens, or cameras. She love's my "museum" (her word for my bedroom where I stash all my out-of-date oddities and ephemera.)
She particularly likes my cameras. I gave her a working Zenit SLR with a moldy prism just to be able to hold and operate it. I told her if she has a real interest in going out and taking some photos that I would also give her a pristine Canon AE-1 Program and a brick of Tri-X. I'm thinking she just might take me up on the offer! 😉