raid
Dad Photographer
FrankS said:But Ben and Raid, under these uncontrolled conditions, (especially the handheld shots at low speeds), perhaps the $40 Jupiter 8 lens will have faired even better, if at the moment of exposure, your hands happened to hold the camera slightly more still during that exposure.
Coming from a science background as I do, I have to take exception to your basic premise of lens testing. If you are going to bother testing lenses against each other, you HAVE to eliminate all variables other than the lens being tested otherwise you cannot come to a conclusion about the performance of a lens where many variables have affected the outcome.
The idea of "real world shooting conditions" just doesn't work if you are testing lenses. Either you understand that or you don't, but that is the way it is, and I stand behind that statement 100%, with all of my integrity on display for ridicule if it is incorrect.
Raid, as a statistician, I am somewhat surprised that this is not obvious to you.
Frank,
If you take many photos at the same setting with one camera, then even handheld photos may give you an insight of its performance. Don't you agree with this? Being a statistician, my professional live has been all about quality control and experiments, so I would not do this with a "scientifically planned experiement". I agree with you on this issue.