ampguy
Veteran
Hi Keith
Hi Keith
Perhaps Phyllis may have a family tree or be able to put dates to the photos.
In any case, it seems that everyone agrees that Bettina, at some point just wanted to be normal and settle down and put her past behind her and not have it trouble her new life.
The fact that her family may have been contacted for good reasons, to be given back some ownership of the bakery or whatever would seem like a good thing, but then there are all those years or maybe decades of hiding that other life.
Very interesting stuff. I hope you are able to get some good info. from Phyllis and to get more answers.
The photos seem like they would be of most interest to Phyllis, I would think?? though maybe not important for her book, if her book was loosely based on her mothers life?? Did she have access to the undeveloped rolls knowingly before she wrote the book?
Hi Keith
Perhaps Phyllis may have a family tree or be able to put dates to the photos.
In any case, it seems that everyone agrees that Bettina, at some point just wanted to be normal and settle down and put her past behind her and not have it trouble her new life.
The fact that her family may have been contacted for good reasons, to be given back some ownership of the bakery or whatever would seem like a good thing, but then there are all those years or maybe decades of hiding that other life.
Very interesting stuff. I hope you are able to get some good info. from Phyllis and to get more answers.
The photos seem like they would be of most interest to Phyllis, I would think?? though maybe not important for her book, if her book was loosely based on her mothers life?? Did she have access to the undeveloped rolls knowingly before she wrote the book?
It's really interesting Ted ... I've been skimming through the book again trying to work out some of the time frames and often Phyllis's descriptions don't quite match what I've surmised by looking at all of these photographs. Given the quality of some of the shots of Bettina in these rolls I'm puzzled as to why Phyllis never chose to have these rolls examined for content and use some of the images for her book.
She only mentions one world trip her mother embarked on and that was one that started in London (leaving from Southampton) in 1937 and went throught the Suez Canal down the coast of Africa ... and it was on a cargo boat apparently. That leaves the world trip that we have seen, unaccounted for totally in her writings. The photos we've seen of her in New Zealand and in Australia are obviously not those of someone on the run!
Her sister Lucie emmigrated to NZ in 1932 so it's likely that the shots of Bettina in NZ were taken before her reported African trip of 1937 and the decision to return there in 1938/39, to take the back door into Australia so to speak, was legitimized to those who may have wondered back in Europe by having a relative living there.
The trip that we have seen parts of obviously started from Canada because we know the routes the Canadian cruise liners of the time took and they are exactly where the rolls of photos have taken us.
I need to go and have a chat to Phyllis as soon as I can arrange it ... she lives on the outskirts of Brisbane apparently!
As for making a film of her life based around the book ... what does it matter? I've never known the movie industry to let the facts get in the way of a good story! 😛