Sexiest looking camera?

Is that the fujifilm X-Pro? I always liked that one, one of the few "affordable" digital rangefinder-style cameras out there. Really nice design and catering to a unique audience, coming from another time.

Yes, exactly... I feel the same way.
 
Black Paint IIIg with a Leicavit (apparently this one sold for £17,500 last year).
657848-50.jpg
 
Black Paint IIIg with a Leicavit (apparently this one sold for £17,500 last year).

The absolute perfection of the black paint seems too good to be true... but I have heard the Leica ii and iii black paint were better than the M's and would not develop bubbles.
 
Cartier-Bresson also had a black paint Leica IIIg. The camera was specially made for him. It was auctioned maybe fiteen years ago for about EUR 40.000,00 if I remember well.

Erik.


24332661436_da5fd793c1_c.jpg
 
Purma Special
http://vintagephoto.tv/purma.shtml

Slow (1/25), Medium (1/150), and Fast (1/450), shutter speeds are selected by holding the camera as shown below :)

VC5330-PumaSpecial-1.jpg

How have I never heard of this camera before? A remarkable piece of industrial design. The shutter speed "setting" is unique and ingenious. I'd love to see some pictures taken with one of these!
 
My original black paint Leica IIIc with Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5. Also, no bubbles. I have this camera over fifteen years or so.

Erik.

33649858731_959aaef2bc_b.jpg

That's beautiful Erik! The auction company should have hired you to do their product photographs.
& those Color-Skopar 50s are wonderful lenses.
 
My top 3 would be: black paint Nikon SP, black paint Leica MP-3, black paint Contax I

A few honorable mentions: chrome Pentax Spotmatic, black Contax G2, Rollie 2.8F white face, chrome Nikon FM3A, Bronica RF645
 
When I first started using digital cameras I didn't quite "get it" with the popularity of Fuji. The high cost didn't seem to justify them.

But after using film cameras I now "get it", Fujis often have the most authentic representation of the vintage functionality, and fully manual control. I'm not sure about the lens quality, but I can now appreciate why people like them so much. They seem to capture the ethos of film photography a little bit better.

I can see why they would be good for someone coming from film, but wanting to "go digital" to save money on film, development, etc., but still likes the old way of doing things.

It probably goes to show I'm a lot younger than a lot of people on here that I'm talking about when I first started using "cameras" (vs. cell phones) and that I used film cameras AFTER I started using digital cameras.

Yes, exactly... I feel the same way.
 
PURMA Special

PURMA Special

Thanks folks, saves me typing (badly).

It's a nice thing to hold and use but I cannot afford 127 film today and don't know what state my one's in. It's a double window, 16 on 127 film camera, btw.


Purma%202-L.jpg



The best source of information is the Focal Press Guide at Mike Butkus but please donate:-

https://www.cameramanuals.org/pdf_files/purma_guide.pdf

The strangest thing about it is that it has three speeds that change by turning the camera around; being a square format the resulting picture is the same. Look beside the VF and you might just make out "SLOW" and "FAST" moulded sideways. They claim pro's carried them as they were very fast to use for grab shots but you have to understand it has one fixed focus lens and just the one aperture (the lens is an uncoated Beck f/6.3). I have seen pictures by an official photographer taken with one during the D-Day landings and, well, look at the book...

It has one unique feature; the lens retracts and has a spring behind it to push it out. The lens cap fits over the lens and you push them both back and screw the lens cap to the body. The shutter is then locked. I wish Leica had thought of that...

They are still cheap, there are three versions and the "PURMA Special" is the one to go after. Usually they come with a box and ERC, like raydm6's picture.

Have fun, David
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom