oops Mike, sorry for the late reply!
Thank you so much! Very glad to know, and thank you again for letting me know
It's a very Japanese gesture, right?
lunch with Kumiko by andreas, on Flickr, Konica Minolta A2, Japan 2007
That girl in the photo you liked is Chinese, taken in China, must be typical there too, but I don't know for sure.
Untitled by andreas, on Flickr, Pentax *istDs + DA21mm, Kathmandu 2009
Portraits can be soft and blurry. Presumably if the lighting is evocative or at least OK. (This image of mine received 25,000 in one night and many faves. Never expected this - go figure)
I agree that a photograph need not be sharp to be very good or excellent. A lack of sharpness may create a mood or emphasize movement, change or tumult and be a conscious artistic decision.
Some of my "best" blurry shots are ones where I have misjudged focus or had a too slow shutter speed by accident. And some are ones I have deliberately blurred wholly or partially in post for effect. Makes no never mind to me. As long as the resulting image works I am happy. Serendipity, thy name is photography.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.