She's got a nice body

Look at the shutter speed dial.

Look at the shutter speed dial.

Also the lack of engraving on the top plate, plus, it says Leica M6 on the front. I would venture it's an M6.
 
Last edited:
Nope, don't think so, the shutter speed selector is too small and far from the front. More likely a M6 or M4.

(Thankfully you saw the beauty of the woman too, not only the camera! :))
 
what is this lens? a summilux 5cm? looks like a vintage summarit to me
 
Last edited:
Given the choice I'm not sure which I'd choose - the camera or the woman.

Both look like they're in mint condition, ready for heavy-duty use.
 
yes its a pre seventies summarit 50mm f1.5 M mount, boy she's shooting without a hood! Wonder if she's into the leica vintage lenses and all... the summarit is a pretty neat piece of glass.
 
Michael I. said:
You Are A Bunch Of Men Discussing A Leica And Not Scarlett Johanson! What Is Wrong With You?
That is STAR TREK bad.
Click to expand...
Gentlemanly restraint, 'tis all. (I think.) ;)

That said, she is attractive, and appears to know a fine way to treat a Summicron, to wreck an Irving Berlin line.


- Barrett
 
Bosk said:
Given the choice I'm not sure which I'd choose - the camera or the woman.

Both look like they're in mint condition, ready for heavy-duty use.
Click to expand...

Given that attitude towards women I think your 'options' are pretty clear as the woman would tell you to buzz off.

Clue for low-brow aussies: Your only option is the camera.
 
Now my two favorite actresses (Jenniffer Connely and Scarlett Johansson) have appeared with Leicas! I think I just died and went to heaven.

Granted Connely just had one in a movie, but still... WE'RE MEANT TO BE
 
You mean this Jennifer?

leicavi0.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom