She's got a nice body

None whatsoever Gareth.🙂 And I'm not losing sleep over her camera skills either, she has plenty of other qualities.

OT: Did you see Lost in Translation? A lot of people didn't like it but I thought it was rather brilliant. It managed to avoid most of the trappings of mainstream Hollywood.

Matthew
 
ChadHahn said:
I see that Ms Connelly has black tape on her Leica. Maybe she can come to the forum and tell us how the producers and director and her spent hours trying to decide which would be the best tape to use.

I hear that they had to shut down production for a week until they came to a decision.

Chad
Click to expand...

One of her ex's is a professional photographer (never married, but had a kid with him), so that might explain a bit.

-C
 
actually not looking through the finder in order to shoot (in a complete candid way) is an expert art photog trick me think. and boy seeing that millionaire actress using that summarit makes me want one. i need a 50mm
 
Matthew Allen said:
OT: Did you see Lost in Translation? A lot of people didn't like it but I thought it was rather brilliant. It managed to avoid most of the trappings of mainstream Hollywood.

Matthew
Click to expand...

Yep, its a great film. It still has some trappings, its whimsical feel is pretty overt. But, the pair of them pull it off very successfully. Part of the charm was the fact that she was so unknown (apart from Ghost World) and Bill Murray was just starting to really explore this new type of role that he seems to be so great in.
 
edodo said:
and boy seeing that millionaire actress using that summarit makes me want one. i need a 50mm
Click to expand...

The producer or director of that movie has done a good product placement for all of us wanna-be Summarit users. 😉

It seems that Johansson uses digital cameras, too but they are not as nice as she or Leica M6 🙂 :
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2007/07/09/scarlett-johansson-woody-allen-spanish-film/

It would be interesting to know, is her role in that movie a professional photographer or else?
 
Last edited:
photogdave said:
Besides, anyone that young who takes up smoking in this day and age demonstrates a lack of intelligence. And yes, offense meant. Smoking is offensive to me and smokers ruin my day on a daily basis! 😡
Click to expand...

Since we are speaking of movies and smoking as well, you should check out a movie called : "Thank you for smoking". Maybe after watching it you will see that intelligence is - making your own descisions, not just follow blindly what others say. I'm not defending smoking. Just saying that what you find offensive, may not be offensive to others and the other way around. You know what they say:
"Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment that you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get."

PS. and to keep it on topic (more or less), is she was holding a pack of Camels instead of a Leica, I'd find her just as hot . 😉
 
Last edited:
Kevin said:
She deserves better than having to work with a pseudo-intellectual whose comic form simply doesn't work.
Click to expand...

You should have begun your description with child molester.

"Child molester, pseudo-intellectual whose comic form simply doesn't work."

I'll add...highly overrated, sicko freak.

However, nothing but praises for the choice of camera and women - Connelly and SJ are two of my favorites...
 
Last edited:
16 people viewing a year old thread....... all because of an attractive title. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom