Sparrow
Veteran
... ah ... reeducation, that explains it
Can't answer that one, but there were still (analog) video cameras that recorded onto miniature floppy disks. You had to use a video capture card to get a digital version of the image, or use the stills like video.Did anyone ever make a stills camera that shoots onto DV or VHS tapes? Serious question.
I agree.
We tend to lose sight of the fact of just how unrepresentative our little corner of photography is with its fixation on Rangefinders ,form factor , film and old film cameras.
I never see any of this stuff out on the streets or discussed within other photography groups.
I`m happy with that but it does suggest that to any new members this may require some explanation.
Hence the repeat questions and speculation.
Thinking of buying an M2 now and having the same issue, as I don't have much money. But then I thought, if I spend the same money (including what I would spend on film and chemicals) on a decent Canon DSLR, that'd be worthless in 10 years too anyway 🙂
The world seems to have a smattering of people who are so convinced of their perception of the world and "how things should be" that they feel obliged to try to evangelise and educate the rest of us toward their way of thinking. A bit like the religious zealots who congregate around railway station exits, handing out some torpor-inducing propaganda....
Being a reasonable person, rather than beat them repeatedly with a Hasselblad 500c/m, I usually just tell them to bugger off back to their own little world and stop bothering the rest of us.
PS - I would hate to think that anyone might perceive me to be in any way anti-digital. I am not. I own a Fuji XPro-1 and a Nikon D800 and enjoy using them both immensely. However, I really don't subscribe to the belief that only one medium or the other has the right to exist.
B---y dead languages ...Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nam lacus. Fusce accumsan. Phasellus vitae elit. Vestibulum eleifend. Nulla sodales elit in quam. Maecenas vehicula urna vel dolor. Cras lorem. Pellentesque aliquet blandit mi. In nisi. Cras id elit. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae.
😛
Err... except I have a suspicion that this post may have been triggered by a contemporaneous post about film dying a second death or some such nonsense that was posted by someone with something like 800 posts...
... Slide film? Another 2-3 years, tops. ...
... I'm sure that's the case, but why go out of your way to tell film users this? ... repeatedly
Can't answer that one, but there were still (analog) video cameras that recorded onto miniature floppy disks. You had to use a video capture card to get a digital version of the image, or use the stills like video.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Still_video_camera
My ex-father-in-law had one like the one pictured at the top.
However, I really don't subscribe to the belief that only one medium or the other has the right to exist.
All film is dead until you shoot it. (pun intended) It's the light that gives it life. 😉
Better to get rid of confirmational bias:
The confirmation bias refers to the tendency to selectively search for and consider information that confirms one's beliefs.
The only way to free yourself of the interminable speculation is to avoid internet forums about it.