Save your money.
The M8 was and is a dud.
Why?
Crop factor.
Need for UV filter.
a sensor that's as old as Canon 20d.
Either you'll have to program your lenses into it, or you'll need to code them.
Which means more money.
Either keep saving your money, or find an alternative.
Never thought I would end up defending the M8, but here goes
🙂
It's certainly not a dud. It's definitely quirky though!
Crop factor - yes, 1.33. Does that matter? Maybe to the buyer. Is full frame worth a paying twice the price - once again maybe. Is it all in the mind - full frame is a crop factor compared to medium format too.
Need for UV filter - the camera does benefit from an IR filter for colour photography, no denying that. However for those interested in IR photography, the M8 is one of the best camera systems out there. Especially from a usage point of view, way easier than an IR converted dSLR. Is it a big deal? Once again depends on the buyer. If buying second hand usually can get seller to include them as part of the deal.
A sensor that's as old as Canon 20D - I'm not so sure about dates. I think the 30D would be more of its era. They are totally different sensors either way. Personally I think the files from the M8 at low iso are phenomenal. Way better than the Nikon D80 files I was shooting back in the day. Best thing for potential buyers is to check out flickr and other sites for M8 shots and make up their own mind.
Program lenses or code them - there is no menu option to program in lenses on the M8 (not sure about the 8.2, but think you need M9 onwards), so coding the lens mount is the only option. Personally I have never had any problems with my uncoded lenses, including my 21mm. Not sure if the crop factor makes it less of a problem. Maybe I don't look closely enough at the files, haven't noticed any problem on prints.
The Leica M8, it's not for everybody. Doesn't stop it being a great camera to produce great pictures for many photographers!