thejameskendall
Established
And my current GAS is cured instantly. Thanks Chris. I'll eat this month after all.
Should i remain a Leica virgin?
- Thread starter rkm
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 132
- Views 12K
- Status
And my current GAS is cured instantly. Thanks Chris. I'll eat this month after all.
thejameskendall
Established
I don't think this is true. The Nikons I've used are good, solid cameras.
Rodchenko
Olympian
Personally, my pulse rises more for a Contax or a Nikon than a Leica, but I do love art deco styling, which probably has a lot to do with it. I forgave my Kiev its quirks for being so classy looking.
But the quality of the engineering in a Leica is a wondrous thing.
But the quality of the engineering in a Leica is a wondrous thing.
noisycheese
Normal(ish) Human
No........... 😀
noisycheese
Normal(ish) Human
If a really old Barnack type camera isn't your cup of tea, you can get a nice used M camera and lens for a song. Look through the classified postings of this website - there are more than a few nice, used M bodies that can be yours for $700-1000ish. Same thing with lenses - I have seen clean used 50/2.8 Elmar M lenses offered for $500-600 and the 28/2.8 Elmarit M lens for $900-1000. Al you have to do is do a bit of shopping.
The stereotype of Leica cameras and lenses that you have to be willing to cough up somewhere between $12,000 and $15,000 to own one Leica camera and lens just doesn't hold water. If you insist on a new digital M or M-Monochrom and a new 50 Summilux ASPH or Leica APO-Summicron-M 50mm f/2.0 ASPH, then yes- that is indeed the case - but there are affordable options that will put a Leica around your neck for thousands less.
JMHO but I say leave the top shelf digital M and mega-dollar lens setups. There is a treasure trove of outstanding film M cameras that are looking for new homes.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
"Should I remain a Leica virgin?" embues the brand with more weight and importance, emotional clout, than it ought to.
A Leica M or Barnack is a camera. A very nice one, a very expensive one, but ultimately and specifically just a camera. Do you want to try using a Leica M? Do it. Are you unsure because of the money involved? Never buy anything that you can't pay cash for, and if that's a stretch, buy something more affordable that does the job.
I got into using and owning Leica cameras from two directions. One was my father, who had a IIIf that he treated like a sacred object. Curiosity got me there. The other was the grizzled old salesman at that shop in Manhattan (LOL! he was probably younger than I am now ... 🙂 who got tired of me hanging about the shop after school and ogling all the dusty old gear in the cabinets.
So I got into Leica because they were cheap and because my father had one. I'd say it took me the next thirty years of doing photography with them, the Nikon F (yes, I did get one but that's another story...) and a bunch of other equipment of all types, to see why the Leica was special.
And I still see it today, even with Voigtländer and Zeiss lenses, every time I use the M for a while and then go off and use my other cameras for a bit.
But ... all that said, in the end it's just a camera, just another tool for a photographer's eye. In 2002, I sold my entire Leica kit to fund the purchase of a Hasselblad 903SWC. That's my sacred object in camera equipment ... I loved the damn thing. But I loved it too much to the point of not wanting to damage it and didn't use it very much. I sold it in 2004 to fund my need for more and better digital equipment, which did me very well. (I've acquired another SWC now, an older one, which I don't hold as sacred as the 903SWC but which I'm much much happier using... 🙂
Don't get sucked into the "Leica virgin" business. If you have the money, buy yourself an M and a lens or two, and make photos with it. If you love it and use it, keep it. If not, sell it and move on. Remember, you can always buy another one if you find that you miss it.
It's the photographs that matter, not the equipment.
G
A Leica M or Barnack is a camera. A very nice one, a very expensive one, but ultimately and specifically just a camera. Do you want to try using a Leica M? Do it. Are you unsure because of the money involved? Never buy anything that you can't pay cash for, and if that's a stretch, buy something more affordable that does the job.
I got into using and owning Leica cameras from two directions. One was my father, who had a IIIf that he treated like a sacred object. Curiosity got me there. The other was the grizzled old salesman at that shop in Manhattan (LOL! he was probably younger than I am now ... 🙂 who got tired of me hanging about the shop after school and ogling all the dusty old gear in the cabinets.
"Hey kid, you ever gonna buy anything?"
"I don't have much money ..."
"How much you got?"
"A hunnert dollars."
"Here..." he placed beaten up IIf and IIc on the counter, one fitted with an Elmar 3.5cm and the other with an Elmar 5.0cm. "Nobody wants this old junk anymore, real photographers use Nikons." (1969 ... a Nikon F Photomic FTn was $430 body only, WAY more than I could even imagine having.)
"I don't have much money ..."
"How much you got?"
"A hunnert dollars."
"Here..." he placed beaten up IIf and IIc on the counter, one fitted with an Elmar 3.5cm and the other with an Elmar 5.0cm. "Nobody wants this old junk anymore, real photographers use Nikons." (1969 ... a Nikon F Photomic FTn was $430 body only, WAY more than I could even imagine having.)
So I got into Leica because they were cheap and because my father had one. I'd say it took me the next thirty years of doing photography with them, the Nikon F (yes, I did get one but that's another story...) and a bunch of other equipment of all types, to see why the Leica was special.
And I still see it today, even with Voigtländer and Zeiss lenses, every time I use the M for a while and then go off and use my other cameras for a bit.
But ... all that said, in the end it's just a camera, just another tool for a photographer's eye. In 2002, I sold my entire Leica kit to fund the purchase of a Hasselblad 903SWC. That's my sacred object in camera equipment ... I loved the damn thing. But I loved it too much to the point of not wanting to damage it and didn't use it very much. I sold it in 2004 to fund my need for more and better digital equipment, which did me very well. (I've acquired another SWC now, an older one, which I don't hold as sacred as the 903SWC but which I'm much much happier using... 🙂
Don't get sucked into the "Leica virgin" business. If you have the money, buy yourself an M and a lens or two, and make photos with it. If you love it and use it, keep it. If not, sell it and move on. Remember, you can always buy another one if you find that you miss it.
It's the photographs that matter, not the equipment.
G
thegman
Veteran
I agree that Leica is given a demi-God status that no camera, or indeed any physical object can really deserve.
They are just cameras, but as far as cameras go, there is a 'specialness' about them, for me at least. Leicas are not my favourite cameras, but it's as clear as day to me why they would be somebody else's.
They are just cameras, but as far as cameras go, there is a 'specialness' about them, for me at least. Leicas are not my favourite cameras, but it's as clear as day to me why they would be somebody else's.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Absolutely. My Nikon F is a precision made tank. Just like the Hasselblads. 🙂
G
jsrockit
Moderator
Yes, you should get it over with now...
Roger Hicks
Veteran
With the indulgence of the court, m'lud, I would suggest that the plaintiff was making a jocular reference to a popular song by a Miss Ciccone.
Cheers,
R.
Vics
Veteran
DANG! You're a real fine shooter! Don't change ANYTHING. Don't buy anything. No, wait. Maybe wet printing? That's a bit of a challenge, but there's nothing quite likle a gelatin silver print at, say, 11x14". Also, off-camera flash is a great skill to have. It may even be automatic with the FE.
dave lackey
Veteran
Give me a break...every member on that Nikon____ site thinks Nikon is God. Canon forums the same way. And many on RFF think their brand is God, or at least sitting at the right hand.😛
Time to stop shooting barbs at Leica because some don't like the brand, the RF, the price or whatever. I use what I love. Leica cameras. If others like other brands, fine with me...you won't find me giving anyone a hard time about their choice of gear, so I expect the same. It is this Leica target shooting that I hate about RFF.
If the OP wants to keep shooting Nikons, great! If he wants a Leica, great! I shot nothing BUT Nikon until 2007, now there is no going back except for the nostalgic good feelings I get when I pick up the FE2. Just my own preference.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Roger Hicks
Veteran
M'lud, I apologize for my lack of clarity. Using what is widely known as a "search engine" (such as the proprietary Google), the words "Like A Virgin" and "Ciccone" will lead to a popular singer who had what is popularly called a "hit" called "Like A Virgin" under the stage name of "Madonna".
Cheers,
R.
JonWNC
Established
Using what is widely known as a "search engine" (such as the proprietary Google), the words "Like A Virgin" and "Ciccone" will lead to a popular singer who had what is popularly called a "hit" called "Like A Virgin" under the stage name of "Madonna".
Or you could just click on the link in post #29 in this thread. 😉
Or you could just click on the link in post #29 in this thread. 😉
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Listen Falstaff: I don't agree.
cosmonaut
Well-known
I always tell people go ahead and get a Leica you can always sell it for basically what you have in it. You really have little to lose.
thegman
Veteran
I'm not quite sure why this was in reply to my post, I was not shooting barbs at Leica, I *do* love Leica cameras, the only reason I don't use them any more is that they are 35mm, not medium format.
Perhaps saying that they are not my favourite was misleading, they are not my favourite, but they are very close to it! When I said 'not my favourite' I should have said, 'not quite my favourite'.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Eh? With what do you not agree?
I mean, she's not a very popular singer any more, but she was when that song was released.
And why Falstaff?
Cheers,
R.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
With the absurd notion that the OP's question and title had anything to do with Madonna's "Like A Virgin" song.
You want to bounce around with "m'lud" and other buffoonery, your name is Falstaff.
G
- Status
Similar threads
