infrequent
Well-known
i think i need a magnifier as well. sometimes i lose the RF patch and sometimes in poor light i am not quite sure if i have accurate focus.
i think i need a magnifier as well. sometimes i lose the RF patch and sometimes in poor light i am not quite sure if i have accurate focus.
Lenses with short focus travel are easier to focus with the Hexar (see Dante Stella's homepage), e.g. my Summicron-C. You need an adapter to use the magnifier designed for Leica (screw-in magnifier for the M6/M7/MP) with the Konica (megaperls has this adapter). I ordered one myself today and will give it a try....
Maddoc, if you have a chance, try the Hexanon 50 F1.2. Amazing test!! As good if not better than Noctilux in term of sharpness IMHO, although I like Noctilux much more for B+W. In fact, Hexanon lens are the finest from Japanese optic co. Also, the Hexanon F1.2 is easier to focus comparing to Noct. Something you might want to consider if you have a Hexar body. By the way, the price of limited 50 F1.2 is still reasonable, get one while you can. Saw one on ebay for 2300 two weeks ago.
The Hexar 50/1.2 is for sure tempting and more is the 60/1.2. But at the moment I am very happy with the Noctilux. Focusing is challenging, especially with the Hexar, but - as you state - for BW the Noctilux simply rocks !! 🙂
Get it before they all disappear!
![]()
It seems that they already have all disappeared ... 😱 straight into your collection 😀 That is impressive !! BTW, why two (!!) 50/1.0 ?? 😕😱😱
Hacker, Why do you need TWO Noctilux + TWO 60 F1.2. I am guessing you also have a summilux ASPHERICAL. By the way, I also had a 60 F1.2 before, but sold it after using both Noctilux and the limited Hexanon 50 F.1.2. Don't really like the extra viewfinder.
Not to be too picky - but I thought this is a Konica thread. What your Rollei, Nikkor, Leica etc, doing here, I'm not sure. 😉 But if you post Hexanons - I'm always happy to see that!. Well, actually even more so - pictures TAKEN WITH THEM, not pics of the lenses!. 😉