Show us your SLR ..... WHAT?

ravilamir said:
Here are mine... (Snip)
Yes, David, there's a 10 and also a 40. ;)
Click to expand...

Hi,

Many years ago I searched out an original OM-1 without the MD badge and the plain base plate. Meaning one that had to be sent back to Olympus for modifying if a MD or winder was to be used.

Alas the prism foam had attacked the prism but I discovered - talking to Micheal Spencer that the OM10 ones fitted (and he had some) and so I got the OM-1 completely restored. Then I started looking for dud OM10's to stockpile prisms but despite buying them in flea markets and so on and never spending more that a fiver for one with the standard lens I never found a dud but I did discover what nice, relaxed cameras they were and the metering is hard to confuse, like the µ-I's. Add the 28mm (cheap) and the 85mm f/2 (dear) or 135mm f/2.8 (cheap) and you've a good outfit...

Regards, David
 
One of my Plaubel Makiflexes, with Plaubel 270mm f5.5 Auto-iris Schneider Tele-Arton, and Graflex 23 Roll FIlm Back. This is what I will be testing next up.
The Stovepipe Viewfinder I cobbled up myself, from an old RB67 mag hood.

2016-02-07 12.33.50 by Nokton48, on Flickr
 
David Hughes said:
Hi,

Many years ago I searched out an original OM-1 without the MD badge and the plain base plate. Meaning one that had to be sent back to Olympus for modifying if a MD or winder was to be used.

Alas the prism foam had attacked the prism but I discovered - talking to Micheal Spencer that the OM10 ones fitted (and he had some) and so I got the OM-1 completely restored. Then I started looking for dud OM10's to stockpile prisms but despite buying them in flea markets and so on and never spending more that a fiver for one with the standard lens I never found a dud but I did discover what nice, relaxed cameras they were and the metering is hard to confuse, like the µ-I's. Add the 28mm (cheap) and the 85mm f/2 (dear) or 135mm f/2.8 (cheap) and you've a good outfit...

Regards, David
Click to expand...

Hi David,

Yes, the OM10 prism will fit the OM-1, but I wouldn't do such a change. The prism deterioration on the OM-1 isn't important to me.
And the damaged prism can just be cleaned and there won't be any visible difference from a new prism. The de-silvering is a real thing, but due to something called total internal reflexion, it won't matter once cleaned of the goo.
This was explained to me by an engineer.
The OM-2 and my OM-1 MD have the prism foam deteriorated. I'm not going to bother to clean it. It was damaged years ago and now it wouldn't do any more damage.
In terms of lens I favour the light and compact ones. So, it is the 135mm /3.5 and not the larger /2.8. Same for the 35mm /2.8 and not the larger and dear 35mm /2. Still looking for the 21mm /3.5.

Regards, Ricardo
 
ravilamir said:
Hi David,

Yes, the OM10 prism will fit the OM-1, but I wouldn't do such a change. The prism deterioration on the OM-1 isn't important to me.
And the damaged prism can just be cleaned and there won't be any visible difference from a new prism. The de-silvering is a real thing, but due to something called total internal reflexion, it won't matter once cleaned of the goo.
This was explained to me by an engineer.
The OM-2 and my OM-1 MD have the prism foam deteriorated. I'm not going to bother to clean it. It was damaged years ago and now it wouldn't do any more damage.
In terms of lens I favour the light and compact ones. So, it is the 135mm /3.5 and not the larger /2.8. Same for the 35mm /2.8 and not the larger and dear 35mm /2. Still looking for the 21mm /3.5.

Regards, Ricardo
Click to expand...

Hi,

Were your ears burning? I've been looking for the old prism and trying to photograph it... It was in an evil state with the silvering off and black gunge everywhere. It didn't cost much extra to replace and I wanted the original OM-1 perfect to keep forever and all that and - of course - then found old age overtook the plans, as it does...

I was lucky with the 135mm f/2.8 and the OM dedicated x2 converter in that they were in a charity shop. I was very impressed with the x2 converter; an interesting beast.

Regards, David
 
I've been searching for ages until I found a mint sample of the Minolta Srt 303. Cla by John T.

f51f3ef95c14989186e880162d346f54.jpg
 
David Hughes said:
Hi,

Were your ears burning? I've been looking for the old prism and trying to photograph it... It was in an evil state with the silvering off and black gunge everywhere. It didn't cost much extra to replace and I wanted the original OM-1 perfect to keep forever and all that and - of course - then found old age overtook the plans, as it does...

I was lucky with the 135mm f/2.8 and the OM dedicated x2 converter in that they were in a charity shop. I was very impressed with the x2 converter; an interesting beast.

Regards, David
Click to expand...

Hi,
I just acquired the x2 converter. I am to still see the results from the 2 lens I own that are compatible.

Regards, Ricardo
 
Waited a bit...

Waited a bit...

Forty years ago our school had Career Day and I invited a photographer from the Arizona Republic to speak. During our lunch break he gave me a quick lesson with his camera and said come back in an hour. A few days later he returned to school with my prints. I was hooked and wanted a Nikon bad. But they were too expensive. I saved my bucks a while and bought a Minolta to start with. But I never did forget using that F2 and always wanted one. Saturday I found one and pounced.
 

Attachments

  • f2.jpg
    f2.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 1
Contax S2 w/CZ Sonnar 85/2.8. This SLR was Kyocera's version of the FM2, being entirely independent of batteries (except for the meter).

contaxS2.jpg
 
Rico said:
Contax S2 w/CZ Sonnar 85/2.8. This SLR was Kyocera's version of the FM2, being entirely independent of batteries (except for the meter).
Click to expand...
If "being entirely independent of batteries (except for the meter)" is the important bit, the FM2 is Nikon's version of the Minolta SRT101 :angel:

It seems the only picture of my SRT on-line is one of the bottom.... One day I'll show a better picture, but for now the bottom has to do:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom