_goodtimez
Well-known
What does a HOT PIXEL look like from a resulting point of view?
How the hell can they be making money hand over fist
Regarding reliability of digital cameras, my M8 has given me the least amount of headache per photo, per day, and probably per euro, out of any serious digital cameras I have owned. The only issues are small rangefinder adjustments and the poor compatibility of third-party batteries (for which it is not necessarily fair to blame Leica). On the other hand, every single Canon DSLR has given me trouble that has resulted in losing a few photos or losing many more opportunities, and I have owned several. It happens.I could buy an X100 or used Canon 5D + a lens for the same amount of money. I don't know why Leica can't fix this issue that everyone else has.
Bob:
I was thinking D2x because I can use ancient Nikon glass which I love.
I'm a bit confused about this out of warranty affair. Each serious repair brings its own certificate for a year's guaranty on the whole camera, and Leica offers the purchase of an extended guaranty.
Come on, if my D90 can make flawless images time after time after time why would Leica be unable to achieve such competence?
I love my Barnacks and my M2 but I don't even consider the 8's or 9's.
Come on, if my D90 can make flawless images time after time after time why would Leica be unable to achieve such competence?
I love my Barnacks and my M2 but I don't even consider the 8's or 9's.
...and kind of sick of digital as a result.
So far, the cameras are glorious disappointments in reliability. They
are fantastic implementations of some kind of ideal but when the rubber
meets the road they don't work reliably. Leica has dropped the ball and
while I love them and their products, they may have lost me for future
new purchases due to their equipment failures.
The issue is one of reliability rather than a specific fault. Nikons are very reliable and digital Leicas are not. There was a survey here maybe a year ago of the type problems/no problems with your M9? I believe the idea was to achieve a large enough pool of responses to give statistical significance to the result. Last time I saw it the fault rate was about 25%, which to me as an amateur photographer is way too much of a risk. I'd love to buy an M9 and I have the glass for it but I'm not prepared to put up with the aggravation.Bet any money your d90 has hot pixel/s. If you shoot raw you wouldn't notice them anyway - they get sampled out in the conversion by most software.
The issue is one of reliability rather than a specific fault. Nikons are very reliable and digital Leicas are not. There was a survey here maybe a year ago of the type problems/no problems with your M9? I believe the idea was to achieve a large enough pool of responses to give statistical significance to the result. Last time I saw it the fault rate was about 25%, which to me as an amateur photographer is way too much of a risk. I'd love to buy an M9 and I have the glass for it but I'm not prepared to put up with the aggravation.
Every person I know who has owned an M8 and or an M9 has had an issue with it.
Phil