D
Deleted member 82967
Guest
Greetings Ted
If you click on the right arrow and go through each slide it gives you all information.
Thanks Roger. The small text at upper right did escape my notice, duh!
Greetings Ted
If you click on the right arrow and go through each slide it gives you all information.
No worries It is hard to see. Like everything else I'm grandfathered in at a excellent rate for the top tier of Zenfolio. It never goes up, so I put up with little things.Thanks Roger. The small text at upper right did escape my notice, duh!
Greetings to the Sigma transplant people, which I'm one of. As for the Sigma Foveon being ASA 100 I found the early models SD9 SD10 were good from 100 to 400 depending on how you used the camera. Think positive film. As for the later models SD14 through the SDQ-H I used up to 3200 ISO
Here are a few snaps at higher ISO Also SPP works excellent for PP which I hate to do so I try to get it right in the camera. One has to learn SPP and it's Free works excellent with the FP series cameras also.
Enjoy![]()
Elitefoto9
Elite Photography by R. E. Jones I use and prefer Sigma Cameras and Lenses. OR, United Stateselitefoto9.zenfolio.com
Roger J.
Greetings to the Sigma transplant people, which I'm one of. As for the Sigma Foveon being ASA 100 I found the early models SD9 SD10 were good from 100 to 400 **depending on how you used the camera**.
Greetings
Here are a few varied ISO shots with different Sigma cameras. The EXIF is in the upper right corner
![]()
Have fun
Roger J.
In the recent Quattro info from Sigma, they have mentioned that the blue layer acts as a luminous layer for the green and red layer as well, it us not clear if that is also the way the Merrill works as well.. But it could explain some of this issues that are sometimes seen when the sensor gets too much light.
There has been a debate going in the past, on whether...the true base iso for the foveon is 100 or 200. I have always felt 200 worked better in general.