Sigma SD Quattro-H interchangeable lens, APS-H sensor

Leica r lens to SA mount adapter

Leica r lens to SA mount adapter

http://www.leitax.com/leica-lens-for-sigma-cameras.html

Whether we are talking about the Nikon one or this one, they were originally designed for the sd14 dslr. How well they work now, who knows. As I said in other post there have been mixed reviews in terms of the results anyway, but I believe this was mainly due to the DP conversion that the Chinese third party did for rf lens usage.. I don't remember about the slr lenses.

Gary
 
jsrockit said:
Can you explain Keith? I've never thought of this.
Click to expand...


I think a few people were wondering if you would nearly have your finger in the side of your eye when shooting. Looking at the pic you posted of the top the camera it's definitely not an issue.

The battery grip certainly adds a new dimension to the size of the camera ... and offers an alternate shutter button for portrait orientation which until you've used such a feature you'll never appreciate how much easier it makes a camera to use.


0478581308.jpg
 
I must admit I certainly don't have any issue with it being dedicated SA mount. Once you've held one of those new ART lenses in your hands you realise the build quality is as good as anything out there ... they really are a cut above what has come before them. And optically they are right up there as well.

As for the looks and layout ... I don't mind a largish camera provided it suits me ergonomically. One thing I have noticed with my SD1M is it's very light and didn't they say the chassis of this thing is magnesium in the blurb ... I can't remember?

So far it's ticking all the boxes for me ... I think the only thing that could hold me back would be a stupid price!
 
Some projected shipping info

Some projected shipping info

Still no price yet, but at least we know about when.

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/new...ip-before-summer-51mp-before-end-of-the-year/

Article has a lot of typos.. but one gets the gist.
- sd Quattro before summer
- sd h Quattro by end of the year
- one stop faster high ISO than DP Quattro
-- so it looks like they either improved the hw or algo since the dp0 was released or a xlation mistake and they meant the Merrill.
- 40% faster refresh rate then DP Quattro LCD screen

So the APS-h version will most likely make it in time for christmas, but both these cameras will take at least a year to settle into their normalized price vs the whatever they decide as a list price. So given my budget, I'm looking at probably late 2017 or early 2018 if the list price is below 2000. Keeping my fingers crossed the APS-h is not going to be around 3000. Plenty of time to save up 🙂

Gary
 
Keith said:
I must admit I certainly don't have any issue with it being dedicated SA mount. Once you've held one of those new ART lenses in your hands you realise the build quality is as good as anything out there ... they really are a cut above what has come before them. And optically they are right up there as well.

As for the looks and layout ... I don't mind a largish camera provided it suits me ergonomically. One thing I have noticed with my SD1M is it's very light and didn't they say the chassis of this thing is magnesium in the blurb ... I can't remember?

So far it's ticking all the boxes for me ... I think the only thing that could hold me back would be a stupid price!
Click to expand...

I have some FF SA mount lenses but the predominance are APS-c, so I'm hoping that the camera was design to be able to use the apsc lenses in mind even if there is a bit of vignetting. Most modern photo sw can eliminate vignetting w/o much fuss anyway. In aperture sw, it is a function I can even setup a preselect save function name by lens for degree of de-vignetting.

Ticks all my boxes as well, including looks and the size of the grip.

Gary
 
Recent interview w/ Sigma CEO sd Quattro and the new lenses

Recent interview w/ Sigma CEO sd Quattro and the new lenses

http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...urprise-mirrorless-debut-future-of-f1.8-zooms

The sd Quattro APS-h will need full frame lenses, but he did say that some apsc lenses would work..however official stand is that the APS-h is a full frame lens requirement.

The APS-h files sizes sound like they are going to be huge the way he talks about the speed difference between the new sd quattros..

No price or date yet.

Gary

Ps. I hope they allow the use of the apsc lenses w/o forced dx mode. If the issue is simply vignetting, that is simple to correct in post.
 
The lenses for the aps-h are going to be huge if you can only use the Sigma FF ones. Bit silly to only use part of them then.
 
One of the things that intrigues me is the wildly fluctuating price of the SD1M. A while ago it was available here in OZ for around $1800.00 which dropped to under $1300.00 for a while and now it's back up to around $3400.00 which I don't believe anyone in their right mind will pay considering the coming options. Also the DP2M a couple of months ago was going for $550.00 now that's back up to $650.00
 
So any news of a release date and pricing yet? I read somewhere back in the thread that maybe going into northern hemisphere summer? ... which ain't that far away!
 
ah yes, just noticed this thread was for aps-h, not aps-c. but the price for the apsc might give a hint for the h, hopefully not more than 50% higher as you say..
 
$999 with the 30mm 1.4 seems like a steal ...as long as you can work within the limitations of the camera and its advantages work for your photography.
 
Can anyone here weigh in on whether the latest version of Sigma Photo Pro (6.3?) has progressed in usability. Most reviews of SPP I find online are from 2012-1014. Those reviews speak of horribly long RAW processing times and difficult-to-use user interface.
 
Jamie

The answer is it depends.... 🙂

How fast is your CPU, do u have at least 8gb of ram? Do u have 2 drives.. A fast ssd for the OS and the applications like spp and another fast drive where the files are written to.

What u expect to accomplish in spp. I only use spp to batch process my raw files into tiff 16. And I use the jpgs from the foveon sensor to decide which raws to send to spp for batch processing. Kick off the batch op and get a snack 🙂.

Come back latter and import into Apple Aperture.

That being said, the Quattro jpg engine is good enough that I actually find that I don't need to use spp as much as I did for the Merrill files.

Latest version of spp is slightly faster.. Currently the only time I have had a crash is when I send to many files to have batch processed. So long as I keep it under 8 files at a time, I haven't had a crash in about a year. I would venture the people who have had process, have either not had enough memory (ram) or they are doing more in spp than I am or some combination of hw and SW that i'm lucky to not have is causing the problem (knock on wood)...

If u have been using an older version and u have a ton of raw files in your library.. If I remember correctly, the new version of the sw seemed to cause a lock up.. It appears to be some sort of new data structure or data base update. My memory is getting pretty bad. But if I remember correctly, after the first time everything was back to normal. So just wait it out.. Anyway take this comment w/ grain of salt since it may just be faulty memory.

The early versions of spp when I first bought my Merrill had a lot more issues than the latest for me at least.

Gary
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
  • Article Article
The Pixii Max: The first real competitor to the Leica digital M’s!
3 4 5
Replies
99
Views
9K
Godfrey
Godfrey
J
  • Article Article
A Leica Lover’s Guide to Acquiring a Digital M:
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
ranger9
R
J
  • Article Article
How Canon Reinvented Itself for Mirrorless and Now Leads the Market!
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
JeffS7444
JeffS7444
J
  • Article Article
What’s the best U.S.-made interchangeable lens rangefinder 35? It depends on your criteria.
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
rick oleson
R
ColSebastianMoran
Adapt Scanner Lens for Camera-Scanning??
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
x-ray
x-ray
Back
Top Bottom