LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
I linked the original size images following the poll I posted previously...You can make a better comparison now...
Here is the original size image from sigma:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28512365@N08/5034458131/
And the one from tri-x:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28512365@N08/5034485753/
well some people were saying film has more pronounced grain, of course as it is pushed to 1600iso whereas sigma is taken at 800 iso. Come on people, pixel peepers...
Here is the original size image from sigma:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28512365@N08/5034458131/
And the one from tri-x:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28512365@N08/5034485753/
well some people were saying film has more pronounced grain, of course as it is pushed to 1600iso whereas sigma is taken at 800 iso. Come on people, pixel peepers...
