"SLR is more versatile" or is it?

I guess for me the choice will be the best tool for the job. I do not do macro or wildlife photography, hence SLR is not what I need. I am very pleased with my R2's performance in documentary and street work and I like the simplicity of full manual rangefinder.
 
Peter, looking at your documentary work and other postings, there's no doubt you've picked the best tools for the job!

Bill, snazzy looking cameras both of 'em. I love the looks of that 35mm f/2 Super-Takumar on the Bessaflex ;)

Gene
 
kris,

discussion is a good thing.
honest, respectful discussion is hard to achieve but can be done on the internet. we just proved it.

joe
 
bill, a bit off topic but- do you like the grip for the bessa r?

i would have to special order it here if i wanted one but it looks so small i wonder if it works ok.
what are your impressions?

joe
 
Gene said:
Peter, looking at your documentary work and other postings, there's no doubt you've picked the best tools for the job!

Bill, snazzy looking cameras both of 'em. I love the looks of that 35mm f/2 Super-Takumar on the Bessaflex ;)

Gene

Yeah, gotta thank you for that, my friend! I'll be shooting with it soon, and hopefully posting a photo or two!

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
backalley photo said:
bill, a bit off topic but- do you like the grip for the bessa r?

i would have to special order it here if i wanted one but it looks so small i wonder if it works ok.
what are your impressions?

joe

Joe,

I like it quite a lot! I got mine for 'free' so to speak - it came with the camera when I bought it used on eBoy - I hadn't even noticed it in the advert. I tried with it off - but I like having something to curl my fingers around, it's quite nice for me. I ended up putting it back on. It *is* small, but just enough, I find. The grippy rubber makes all the difference.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Brian, holy crap - is that a black SP?

Can I have it?

Please.
 
damn, just what i didn't want to hear!

i've always like grips in the past and i was afraid this might not be the exception.
i better go see how much they cost...

joe
btw, thanks for the info bill!
 
The SP is a "Shintaro Black-Paint" SP. I bought the camera about 4 years ago, it had a large dent on the top plate and the top bezel. The dent was probably the result of a 5cm F1.1 lens being dropped on it; I did not buy the lens with the camera but at least got to play with it. Otherwise, the camera was near mint. I sent it to Shintaro in Japan, and about a year later it came with no signs of the dent. If anyone is interested, I can send some detailed pictures showing the black-painted top, bezel, and back matching up near perfectly to the original black side and trim finish. After its long trip, I had to remove the bezel and calibrate the RF. Yesterday, I cleaned the focus helical. It operates as nice as it looks. It is the Titanium Curtain version, which is louder than the cloth version. No more Nikon Finger Blisters. The paint job was $600, or about double what I paid for the Mint Black F2 that is keeping "Grand-Dad" company.

Peter; note that I use the term "Documentation" as opposed to documentary. I work in a Lab were we make a lot of custom devices. A Macro lens is all that is ever used, unless the camera is mounted on a microscope. I probably should have said scientific documentation work.

Joe, if you lived at my house I would not be able to get you out of the Hot Tub that came with the pool that we did not know was in back of the house until after we bought it.

Bill: Note the collapsible rubber hood on the 43mm Skylight filter. These were made for some Canon P&S camera, and I found them at a clearance center. Quite nice, they collapse and still allow a 44mm slip-on cap or 43mm clip-on cap. But my favorite shade is the Walz Series VI Vented shade that lives with the Summarit.
 
Last edited:
Thats a v nice SP Brian, I would like to see more detailed pic's of it (emailed to me or posted here). If your SP or F2 get bored they can come hang out with my F :p

I'm wondering how many RF users have older Nikon SLRs as well?
 
Laika said:
I'm wondering how many RF users have older Nikon SLRs as well?
No Nikons, but a still-beautiful pair of Olympus OM-1's and a nice set of Zuiko primes. Personally, I always preferred the smaller size of the Olympus to the Nikon. I think Olympus was the Leica of the SLR world.

Gene
 
"Joe, if you lived at my house I would not be able to get you out of the Hot Tub that came with the pool that we did not know was in back of the house until after we bought it."

got a nikonos?

joe

ps - gene, i agree! the oly om series was one of my favs, easily beating out the larger nikons & canons.
that being said though, the canon t90 is still probably my favourite camera of all time (on most days)
joe
 
I use a pair of Nikon F's from the late 60's. Non-metered prisms, set of 4 Nikkor lenses, 35mm - 135mm. I can always rely on them.

What makes me curious is why Joe likes the Canon T90 so much. I don't know much about the Canon T series.

-Paul
 
paul,

despite it's size it was the perfect camera. great ergonomics, easy to use yet had pretty much every feature you could want or imagine, had a great spot meter that could average out 6 or 9 readings (can't remember anymore).
it just worked wonderfully and didn't ask much of the shooter.

joe
 
Laika said:

I'm wondering how many RF users have older Nikon SLRs as well?

Count me in. My "other camera" is a Nikon FE, the last camera that Nikon made with everything I'll ever need.
 
Thanks to this thread I've just found some work for my SRT ! I've mounted the 50, put it on a tripod, set up a background and... taken a close-up roll of all my cameras :)

For that kind of work and for telephotos > 135 or so I'd say the SLR is the best tool.

Very interesting discussion with many points of view, so Kris there's no need to apologize at all ;)

Psst, eh, Brian, interested in a trade for that black SP ? I have a Kiev 4am that is every bit as nice as that one, and it even looks better with the original chrome :D
 
Last edited:
I think that we all have demonstrated open minds, select the proper tools for the job, and use both SLR's and RF's. The fact that most of us are long-time SLR users that use RF's for a lot of work demonstrates that each has their strong points. This should be considered when deciding to get into RF photography. I like the RF's better for "people pictures". At an airshow, it is the F2AS with 300mm F4.5 and the Photomic F with a 500mm F8 mirror lens. The latter has a built in incident light meter that is quite accurate. For bird photography and FE2 mounted on a Meade 1000mm lens. But for existing light and capturing Nikki at play, it is the SP, S3, Canon 7, or M3.

Oscar, I would trade but I already have a Kiev 4a with a very accurate meter.

Laika, Nice F! I have several F's, but none with the Black Eye-level finder. I love the F, it's sound level is much lower than the F3 or F2. Of course it and the SP share many components, including the shutter.
 
Last edited:
Tsk, oh well, better luck next time ! ;)

Btw do you do bird photography also ? I was involved in that around 12-15 years ago, using mostly 500mm mirror lenses and nature telephotos with T adapters. Of course I was a kid and only walked around but the people in the naturalist group sometimes allowed me to take some shot.
 
Back
Top Bottom