Small, light, inexpensive, but capable camera

FrankS

Registered User
Local time
9:18 AM
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
19,343
Location
Canada, eh.
This one is mine, I'm sure you have one too.

$50 for body and lens

Bought chemistry today too.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 0
Does my Franka Solida 2 count? It will fit in the back of my jean pocket and I paid $69 for it. While it has a triplet from Ena Werk, I find that this particular samples is as good as some of the Tessar sample I have had from folders in this era.

Please excuse iPhone picture.

Gary
 

Attachments

  • image-3528651259.jpg
    image-3528651259.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 0
Somebody gave me a Maxxum 5 body. It is a hateful little flimsy thing, but works great and is weightless. Light, worthless ($15 or less), and very capable, so the perfect bicycle camera to me.
 
$50 with shipping from KEH

6859587237_56cf80b488.jpg
 
Most of my SLR cameras are big and heavy. But for when I don't want to lug a metal brick around, this one rarely lets me down.

Canon AE-1 with FD 50/1.8 by Greyscale3, on Flickr

But small, light, inexpensive and capable, it's hard to beat this one that I found at a thrift shop for $1.75


Canon MC by Greyscale3, on Flickr

but I think that this one will grow on me


Olympus 35 ECR by Greyscale3, on Flickr
 
My cheapest Rollei 35S costed me $32 - alright since not every one can get an Rollei 35S at that price, I would recommend either Olympus 35RC or Voigtlander Vito II (not IIa).
I love this camera, small - yes, capable - yes, light - okay, but inexpensive ($50) it is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom