PentaxFanatiK
Member
My friend at work recently gave me a SMC PENTAX-M 135mm f2.5
Made in Japan - K Version (Non Takumar)
I'm calling on your knowledge to help me find what a lens like this might be worth?
It's Minty! Beautiful and comes with the hard case too ;-)
Thanks for the help ;-)
Made in Japan - K Version (Non Takumar)
I'm calling on your knowledge to help me find what a lens like this might be worth?
It's Minty! Beautiful and comes with the hard case too ;-)
Thanks for the help ;-)
DeeCee3
Established
I bought one of those a year or so ago and seems I paid around USA$150 for it. It was a nice lens and I enjoyed using it but it was a bit heavy and overlapped a zoom I had which was a lot lighter weight.
dc3
dc3
Kim Coxon
Moderator
A minor point if you come to sell the lens. I suspect the lens you have is the SMC Pentax 135/2.5. This is not an M lens but one of the original series lenses based on the SMC Takumar. The only M version of the 135 was the 135/3.5 M.
Kim
Kim
Sam R
Established
sold my 100mm f2.8n K mt pentax for $80...but probably worth 100
titrisol
Bottom Feeder
Why sell it? put it in your K100D and love it!
It hosuld be worth anywhere between 80 and 150 depending on who you sel it to.
check the KEH website and ePay auctions for similar items
PS just saw the flickr picture of it... NOICE!!!
Also check specs and all here:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/tele/K135f2.5.html
It hosuld be worth anywhere between 80 and 150 depending on who you sel it to.
check the KEH website and ePay auctions for similar items
PS just saw the flickr picture of it... NOICE!!!
Also check specs and all here:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/tele/K135f2.5.html
Last edited:
P
polaski
Guest
Monetary worth: maybe $100 or more. Photographic worth? It's a neat, small, sharp, lens in a classic focal length. I use it on everything from a KX to my new K10D. Give it a try.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
A good quality 135 in K mount is not easy. This lens and the early 3.5 versions were excellent and quite reasonably priced. The 135/2.8A is not regarded as one of Pentax's better efforts. The 125/1.8A is like rocking horse droppings. The 2 AF versions are very good but are difficult to find and go for around £200+. The CV 125/2.8 Macro is surperb but pricey and are getting rarer now they are discontinued. The "cheap" Takumar versions are not much better than the 3rd party ones.
All in all the K135/2.5 is probably the best value going. Excellent performance and still reasonable price. It is compatible with the dSLRs as well although you will have to use manual metering.
Kim
All in all the K135/2.5 is probably the best value going. Excellent performance and still reasonable price. It is compatible with the dSLRs as well although you will have to use manual metering.
Kim
PentaxFanatiK
Member
Kim Coxon said:A minor point if you come to sell the lens. I suspect the lens you have is the SMC Pentax 135/2.5. This is not an M lens but one of the original series lenses based on the SMC Takumar. The only M version of the 135 was the 135/3.5 M.
Kim
Kim,
You're right! I always make the mistake of adding the "-M" to my descriptions purely to denote that it's a manual lens! Which we know anyway...lol
So yes..I have the SMC Pentax 135/f2.5
I've no plans to sell it, just wondering what it's worth?
Thanks for the replies everyone, if you can add more or tell me more, I would really appreciate it ;-)
Richard
Last edited:
P
polaski
Guest
The SMC 135mm f/2.5 lens has just about reached the status of a cult lens. The much more common non-SMC version, which I have, sells for practically a song. The SMC version gets bid up to a couple of hundred dollars sometimes.
All things considered, if I use a lens hood and pay attention to sources of light, flare isn't a problem.
All things considered, if I use a lens hood and pay attention to sources of light, flare isn't a problem.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
Terminology again. The lens we are talking about here is the K mount SMC Pentax. I think the lenses you are talking about are the SMC Takumar and Super Takumar M42 ones.
Kim
Kim
polaski said:The SMC 135mm f/2.5 lens has just about reached the status of a cult lens. The much more common non-SMC version, which I have, sells for practically a song. The SMC version gets bid up to a couple of hundred dollars sometimes.
All things considered, if I use a lens hood and pay attention to sources of light, flare isn't a problem.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
I have one. I like it, it has its own charm 
As for the value, maybe not too much, I got mine along with a couple other lenses, so I can't tell.

As for the value, maybe not too much, I got mine along with a couple other lenses, so I can't tell.
PentaxFanatiK
Member
Ok...I should have done this with the first post I made ;-)
Here are two quick shots I just took of the lens to help clarify what I have!
Here are two quick shots I just took of the lens to help clarify what I have!


Kim Coxon
Moderator
Yup, The SMC Pentax. I think I have a couple of spare hoods (sorry "shades") lying around if you need one.
Kim
Kim
PentaxFanatiK
Member
Kim Coxon said:Yup, The SMC Pentax. I think I have a couple of spare hoods (sorry "shades") lying around if you need one.
Kim
Thanks for the offer Kim! The lens came with a "shade" as well, so I'm good
PentaxFanatiK
Member
Just wanted to say Thanks Again for the help and info on this lens 
rolleistef
Well-known
I started a thread about the 135 2.5 m42 tak which is quite close, but not as good (, and posted a couple of test shots, if you want to make an opinion.
http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52702
http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52702
zuikologist
.........................
imho, unless you need the money or don't intend to use the lens, hold onto it. As Kim C said above, this version is not that common and is highly regarded by many.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.