So good!....but so elusive!

Dave Wilkinson

Dave Wilkinson

Veteran
Local time
8:47 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
2,289
Location
Hull, Yorkshire, U.K
View My Gallery
One of the main reasons for my continued regular use of film, is this camera - bought for 'a song' back in February, I am still captivated by it, and wish I had picked one up way back in '84 when it was released!. These Hexanons are tremendous lenses ( I have three ) and so reasonably priced, when they appear on the market!. One of my favourite focal lengths is an 80 or 85, and I believe that Konica made a fast AR version, but can I find one? :bang:. So if anyone has one gathering dust, spare a thought!.
Cheers, Dave.🙂
 

Attachments

  • ft1.jpg
    ft1.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 0
Dave Wilkinson said:
One of the main reasons for my continued regular use of film, is this camera - bought for 'a song' back in February, I am still captivated by it, and wish I had picked one up way back in '84 when it was released!. These Hexanons are tremendous lenses ( I have three ) and so reasonably priced, when they appear on the market!. One of my favourite focal lengths is an 80 or 85, and I believe that Konica made a fast AR version, but can I find one? :bang:. So if anyone has one gathering dust, spare a thought!.
Cheers, Dave.🙂
Click to expand...
Bump!....someone must have one in the closet 🙁
 
Konica were never among the market leaders, and the 85/90/100/105 range was not terribly popular among users of SLRs. Not a helpful response, I know: but it does amount to a bump.
 
I have the same camera in a drawer, with non-working viewfinder LEDs. I just have to find the time to open it up and try cleaning all the contacts. The lens yours is mounting is definitely on my wanted list. 🙂 I only have the 50mm 1.7 and 1.8, a 135mm 3.5, and a Tamron 80-200 I practically got for free. A pity my second AR-mount body, a TC, needs a CLA.
 
I have the 85/1.8 but it's not going anywhere, at least not yet! It, the 40 (a great lens) and the 24/2.8 make for a very nice kit with my T3.

The FT-1 is a very fine camera -- solid and well laid out. It doesn't have depth of field preview, though, and you need to treat the battery compartment contacts with care.
 
shadowfox said:
Dave, maybe you can convince this seller on craigslist that you're not an out-of state scammer.

It's a good deal too with that many Konica AR lenses.
Click to expand...
Yes, that would be a good deal, but a little too much there for me, and lord knows what the cost of crossing the pond would be!😱 .....just a nice short tele, for the portraits, and I'll be happy!🙂
Dave.
 
I have read about the Fx-1 series, and it appears that while they are nice, compact bodies, when they go bad, it's not easy to get them repaired, and often not economic.

The T4 seems like a better choice as a replacement, even though it's not as small (I don't think), and maybe the T3 is better yet, but larger again. Kinda defeats the purpose of the pancake 40.

Anyone have advice?
 
Trius said:
I have read about the Fx-1 series, and it appears that while they are nice, compact bodies, when they go bad, it's not easy to get them repaired, and often not economic.

The T4 seems like a better choice as a replacement, even though it's not as small (I don't think), and maybe the T3 is better yet, but larger again. Kinda defeats the purpose of the pancake 40.

Anyone have advice?
Click to expand...
I have no experience of other models as there are few around here, but this FT1motor has pleased me more than anything else, for years, and there have been a few! BTW there are quite a few of my shots from the 40mm pancake on my flickr :- Tubal Cain's photostream, and Konica forum there.
cheers, Dave.
 
Dave Wilkinson said:
Yes, that would be a good deal, but a little too much there for me, and lord knows what the cost of crossing the pond would be!😱 .....just a nice short tele, for the portraits, and I'll be happy!🙂
Dave.
Click to expand...

Good grief! Dave, my apology, I for some reason think that you're stateside! 😱
 
payasam said:
Konica were never among the market leaders, and the 85/90/100/105 range was not terribly popular among users of SLRs. Not a helpful response, I know: but it does amount to a bump.
Click to expand...

I agree with payasam, but not among the market leaders doesn't necessarily mean a poor product. In fact, I'm not so sure that any of these 70-90s SLR lenses are too much different. Maybe small nuances, but that is for an experienced photographer (not me) to decide. You should be able to find that length by Konica (my Konica C35 is the best travel camera I have had [lenses quality, but that isn't everything], and I have had a few Canons and Olympus P&S cameras that have been nightmares). Just keep looking, Ebay has a search save provision, so you can key in what you want for 6 months or more and they send you emails.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
  • Article Article
The Mysterious Leica M5 of 1992: We now know more, but not all!Wetzlar made 20 M5s 17 years after it ceased production, but why?
2 3
Replies
43
Views
3K
38Deardorff
38Deardorff
J
Did Nikon really blow Leitz and Zeiss out of the water in 1950? Not quite, but....
Replies
9
Views
1K
aoresteen
aoresteen
J
  • Article Article
What exactly is a point & shoot camera? Glad you asked!The Kodak of 1888 may have been the first, and even Leica got into the act!
Replies
17
Views
1K
Mos6502
Mos6502
J
  • Article Article
Who invented the Leica M3 and IIIg? Two great men at Leitz Wetzlar! Both projects were team efforts led by innovative engineering geniuses.
Replies
13
Views
607
Ljós
L
J
  • Article Article
The Rise, Fall, and Resurrection of the 110 Cartridge Format. Part 1: Drop-in cartridge film formats: Prioritizing user convenience.
2 3
Replies
42
Views
4K
neal3k
neal3k
Back
Top Bottom