iggers
Established
Maybe I spend too much time fooling around with overly complicated and finicky German and Russian cameras.
The Canonet 28 delivers a lot of bang for the buck, compared to many of those cameras. Its easy to use, and seems to "get" a high percentage of good shots and not many bad ones. (Wazzat?)
My Canonet 28 isn't the prettiest, as the glass of the front rf part next to the viewfinder is broken (which explains why it cost $1 or so.) As well, for some reason on a few occasions while shooting the most recent roll, the needle stayed at the bottom of the scale in the viewfinder, and I had to jiggle the tab that one moves between A and aperture settings for flash, in order to get the needle to move.
I think the results were pretty good:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fortinbras/sets/707670/
Now its time to shoot with the Canonet-28's cousin, the Canon A35F, which appears to be the same camera but in a black body with a pop-up flash.
The Canonet 28 delivers a lot of bang for the buck, compared to many of those cameras. Its easy to use, and seems to "get" a high percentage of good shots and not many bad ones. (Wazzat?)
My Canonet 28 isn't the prettiest, as the glass of the front rf part next to the viewfinder is broken (which explains why it cost $1 or so.) As well, for some reason on a few occasions while shooting the most recent roll, the needle stayed at the bottom of the scale in the viewfinder, and I had to jiggle the tab that one moves between A and aperture settings for flash, in order to get the needle to move.
I think the results were pretty good:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fortinbras/sets/707670/
Now its time to shoot with the Canonet-28's cousin, the Canon A35F, which appears to be the same camera but in a black body with a pop-up flash.