Spyderman
Well-known
Hi,
after using color-negs for a long time, I wanted to try something different and I chose Fomapan 400. I rated it at ISO 400 and had it developed by a local guy who does developing so I don't know what he used - but I guess something cheap like Fomadon or similar.
Even though it came out slightly underexposed (some people suggest rating Fomapan 400 as 250) I was very surprised by the dynamic range. I scanned it at color positive setting and 48bit color depth. Then inverted it and adjusted black and white points in levels. Nothing more was needed...
I still have the second roll in the camera, but results from the first roll can be seen in my blog (click) or in my flickr photostream (click).
Thanks in advance for comments. 😉
after using color-negs for a long time, I wanted to try something different and I chose Fomapan 400. I rated it at ISO 400 and had it developed by a local guy who does developing so I don't know what he used - but I guess something cheap like Fomadon or similar.
Even though it came out slightly underexposed (some people suggest rating Fomapan 400 as 250) I was very surprised by the dynamic range. I scanned it at color positive setting and 48bit color depth. Then inverted it and adjusted black and white points in levels. Nothing more was needed...
I still have the second roll in the camera, but results from the first roll can be seen in my blog (click) or in my flickr photostream (click).
Thanks in advance for comments. 😉
Last edited:

