sounds silly but to ALL BESSA users how you manually focus and shoot using R ??

sfb_dot_com said:
I think all the advice has been good here, but...

I'm beginning to get a sense of deja vue. Sorry if I'm wrong, but aren't these just the sort of questions a certain now departed member of the forum would post in order to wind up the more ernest & worthy stalwarts?

Just a guess...

Andy

The deja vue has been investigated..... I was wrong too.
 
rover said:
The deja vue has been investigated..... I was wrong too.

Deja vu or not, I still guess how one can hold a R in your hands and expect to look through the lens with the finder ? 😕 It is the first time ever in my life that I see such a "misunderstanding" of an RF system.

bertram
 
>>The deja vue has been investigated..... I was wrong too.<<

Well, we all have to start somewhere. Still, a llittle bit of online research would answer a lot of these basic questions. So would buying a used camera for $40.
 
>>The deja vue has been investigated..... I was wrong too.<<

There aren't any single individuals who hold a monopoly on specific behavior patterns. Just because it's not THAT person doesn't mean these someone else can't ask similar questions. It's a harmless review of photo basics, I guess.
 
Guys, a newcomer asks pertinetn questions and some of us here doubt his integrity and tell him to get a $40 camera? Come, this isn't P.net. We're helpful here, remember? And these threads are good starts for other newcomers. Maybe they could be made permanent (or pinned or whateveryoucallittomakethemappearatthetopoftheforum)?
 
Because Mark Haagen-Dasz lives in the greater New York City area, it might be a good idea to venture to one of the larger camera shops downtown and spend some time handling the a Bessa and a Leica to get a feel for what's going on.

And I do believe $40 these days will buy one heckuva goodused film SLR with standard lens. Nikkormats and Canon FTbs and old Pentaxes are excellent ways to learn film photography. Same for buying a nice old fixed lens RF.

Or a former Soviet RF system, for that matter.
 
RML said:
Guys, a newcomer asks pertinetn questions and some of us here doubt his integrity and tell him to get a $40 camera? Come, this isn't P.net. We're helpful here, remember? And these threads are good starts for other newcomers. Maybe they could be made permanent (or pinned or whateveryoucallittomakethemappearatthetopoftheforum)?

Thank you for the reminder.
 
As I understand Haagen-Dasz he used a SLR in full auto befor. Even from my Contax Av SLRs to a manual only RF was a big jump even with my experience with manual cameras from way back.

Come to think of that, setting exposure on a Rollei 35TE is easy compared to my Zorki 4 and Kiev 4.
Even the big shutterwheels on my Contax G2 and G1 can't be operated witout letting go of the shutter.

So the lesson to learn about exact exposure and fast shooting with rangefinders is, don't try it 🙂

Set your shutter to a decent speed and adjust with the aperture, then rely on the film, if in doubt, bracket!
 
You may have enough to digest already but there is another method of focusing your Bessa that no one has mentioned. This has nothing to do with obtaining the proper exposure. If you look at the top or bottom edge of the rangefinder patch then align the two parts, (inside the RF patch and outside the patch) instead of looking at the middle of the patch and over-lapping the two images. It's kind of like looking at the split image circle on a manual focus SLR. I've found this method helpfull to me when I've struggled with glare inside the viewfinder. Others may be able to explian this better than I can.
 
VinceC said:
I caught onto this a couple of days ago. Join date is 13 March. Go figure. I'm patient, but the level of detail of these questions can be found using Google and a quick browse through the forums.It's all pre-Photo 101 stuff, yet there's a Fred Miranda ID ...

hey come on guys
i woke up this morning to alot of these rather.. negative posts 🙁 🙁 🙁

i do know ALL the basic stuff at the back of my hand coz i have been shooting with slr for 5 years now ?

so i have no problems with f stop, speed and distance.

i am simply trying to understand how the RF works and how i can manually focus fast. You guys probably dont believe me but the AF system on the canon SLR are just as BLAZING fast. If you stick a L glass onto the SLR, its lightning TOO.
 
Bertram2 said:
Deja vu or not, I still guess how one can hold a R in your hands and expect to look through the lens with the finder ? 😕 It is the first time ever in my life that I see such a "misunderstanding" of an RF system.

bertram

i am really trying to understand the RF as I venture into a new style of photography.
 
RML said:
Guys, a newcomer asks pertinetn questions and some of us here doubt his integrity and tell him to get a $40 camera? Come, this isn't P.net. We're helpful here, remember? And these threads are good starts for other newcomers. Maybe they could be made permanent (or pinned or whateveryoucallittomakethemappearatthetopoftheforum)?

Thank you for the support 😛
 
Set the exposure for the light and leave it alone, focus as per the manual tells you, or hyperfocus.

Forget a lot of SLR stuff.

It's like moving from a car to a motorcycle.
 
It is an interesting and rewarding new photographic style that comes with a fairly steep learning curve. I apologize for lapsing into being a jerk.
 
Socke said:
As I understand Haagen-Dasz he used a SLR in full auto befor. Even from my Contax Av SLRs to a manual only RF was a big jump even with my experience with manual cameras from way back.
now someone feels for me! yeah ! 😛

Socke said:
Even the big shutterwheels on my Contax G2 and G1 can't be operated witout letting go of the shutter.
oh yes FINALLY someone understands some of my pain/questions..
 
Mark,
I tned to vary the aperture more than speed when I shoot the Bessa but it is not really any harder to shoot the other way.
The meter LEDs in the bessa will stay lit up for (I think) 12 seconds after you lightly press the shutter button to get a reading. so you don't have to hold that pressure constantly--it's not like locking in a focus point with an AF camera. And if you leave the wind lever out from the camera body it's pretty easy to turn the speed dial.
I think you mentioned that you don't have a lens yet? A lot of this stuff will make better sense when you do and can "dry fire" the camera a bit.
The reason people say that shooting RFs is fast is that since you can set both f/stop and speed ahead of time(focus too if you want) and then just raise the camera to your eye, focus and shoot.
I'll dig through my book-marks and see what I can find that will explain this stuff better than I can.
Rob
 
Mark, I have poor eyesight also, a rangefinder will help a little.

1. Rangefinder cameras make you slow down. Kind of ironic since rangefinders are used mostly for "snap" type shots. The reasoning here is that all of the setup work is done ahead of time. Metering, speed and f-stop selection and some rough focusing are done first. It's almost as if you are taking pictures with an overly priced instamatic. The difference being that you reconfigure your instamatic at will.

2. Most people who use rangefinder camera's shoot black and white. B&W gives you a wider fudge factor when it comes to exposure. It's not any harder to use color, it's just you have to be more exact with your exposure.

3. I suggest you do not pay any attention to the meter, pull the battery on the R, it will still work. That will teach you to rely upon the best meter you already have: your eyes. There are lots of folks here who can tell you the speed and f-stop for a given film type based on experience alone. It's a lot faster than a meter and can be more accurate. You have to be willing to fail alot first. Once you get over your reliance on a meter you can then get a meter for those really tricky lighting situations.

See: See Fred Parkers "Ultimate Exposure Computer" some of us keep a version in our camera bags for reference.

BTW: what lens did you get?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom