Erik L
Well-known
have a look at the following thread : http://photo.net/medium-format-photography-forum/000McE it sounds like the 80mm is usable if stopped down 2-3 stops, and is esp. useful if your enlarger head has a normal (rather than XL) distance to the base. conservative view: 105mm is probably safer to avoid light fall-off.
let me know if you are interested in the schneider?
greetings from hamburg
rick
hmm i will pass. thanks though.
Al Kaplan
Veteran
The 105 lenses are designed to easily cover 6.5x9cm (2.5x3.5 inch) negatives. 90mm is more than enough for 6x7cm. I use a 105/4.5 Rokkor, a 4 element design that I bought back about 1970. I was young, poor, and couldn't afford a Componon or El Nikkor. I'm still using it. When the Componon-S series came out I bought an 80/5.6 Componon (non "S") on close-out because it WAS better than my three element 75mm Spiratone but didn't bother upgrading the 105.
mbisc
Silver Halide User
Patience Grasshopper
Patience Grasshopper
As mentioned by rxmd, buying enlarger lenses on fleabay (at a good price) is largely an exercise in patience.
I don't think I would pay $200 for that lens...
Patience Grasshopper
here is what i can get at the moment
tell me if this is a good deal-to me i like what you paid personally![]()
As mentioned by rxmd, buying enlarger lenses on fleabay (at a good price) is largely an exercise in patience.
I don't think I would pay $200 for that lens...
Erik L
Well-known
ok thanks everyone i have made up my mind.
Share: