It's like Yeti, known to many, but rarely seen.
Great accident. I've only once had them in almost epidemic shape - but none falling as decoratively into the image. In my case probably a combination of something omitted in the production of a Ektachrome batch with the RZ67 motor drive spooling on faster than common for 120. But it seems to be a widespread issue in aerial photography, where it is quite common for the air humidity to drop to positively unhealthy levels.
I couldn't believe my luck! Once in 40+ years! The discharge is double-ended, and effectively symmetrical, but the other end (in the next 14x21mm frame) was nothing like as beautifully placed. It was, of course, a cold, dry day.
As for Rob-F, I'm pretty sure that what you are describing are not static marks, but stress or pressure marks from bending. They're quite easy to replicate.
Cheers,
R.
Like many problems they have been addressed by the film vendors. Some early polyester stocks were particularly "evil". Most modern films these days have on their bases an anti-static treatment.Anyone else ever have trouble with 'em?
A combination, I'd guess, of motor drive, plastic cartridges, the felt used and film without an anti-static..It's only ever happened to me once, about 30 years ago, with a Tessina.