rubercoober
Member
https://www.thephoblographer.com/20...anon-50mm-f0-95-on-ebay-know-that-its-stolen/
Fellow photographer Daniel Zvereff had his Canon .95 dream lens stolen in Mexico recently. It popped up on eBay earlier and is being sold by someone in Mexico known for peddling stolen camera equipment. Just wanting to make this aware to anyone on the forum who might have bid on this lens. I don't know if there is any way to get this back to him as eBay can't do anything at this point but flag the seller. If you know of a way, email Dan at zvereff@gmail.com.
The auction ends tonight and has plenty of bids, it's going to sell. The question is whether or not we can do anything to help get it back to him.
Admins, if this is in the wrong forum, feel free to move it. Cheers.
Fellow photographer Daniel Zvereff had his Canon .95 dream lens stolen in Mexico recently. It popped up on eBay earlier and is being sold by someone in Mexico known for peddling stolen camera equipment. Just wanting to make this aware to anyone on the forum who might have bid on this lens. I don't know if there is any way to get this back to him as eBay can't do anything at this point but flag the seller. If you know of a way, email Dan at zvereff@gmail.com.
The auction ends tonight and has plenty of bids, it's going to sell. The question is whether or not we can do anything to help get it back to him.
Admins, if this is in the wrong forum, feel free to move it. Cheers.
Chuffed Cheese
Established
Fairly easy to buy it. Open an item not described properly case after receiving it. Send back a brick and easy peasy you have your lens back and they get no money.
rubercoober
Member
Fairly easy to buy it. Open an item not described properly case after receiving it. Send back a brick and easy peasy you have your lens back and they get no money.
But if you have a card on file with eBay, how do you even begin to avoid the ****storm of the seller arguing that they sent back a brick? Unless you say "they sent me a brick, I want my money back". I imagine they'd just charge you the balance.
mpaniagua
Newby photographer
In my experience as seller, Ebay always side with the buyer, soo....
mpaniagua
Newby photographer
From what I see, people is bidding too high and wont pay, to slow down the sale.
(price is currently $20,100.00)
Marcelo
(price is currently $20,100.00)
Marcelo
Huss
Veteran
If the original owner has the serial # and police report showing it stolen all he has to do
is buy it then show ebay it was stolen and get them to refund him. if they don't they can be charged w willfully trafficking stolen items.
is buy it then show ebay it was stolen and get them to refund him. if they don't they can be charged w willfully trafficking stolen items.
Huss
Veteran
Or he can contact the police dept in Cupertino where eBay is based and show them the report and that eBay is aiding in selling his stolen property if they don't do anything.
raid
Dad Photographer
which ebay auction is it?
xmas_one
Established
It’s at 5800 with 2.5 hours remaining.
raid
Dad Photographer
Yes, I see this one. Thanks.
raid
Dad Photographer
Why isn't anyone posting something at ebay about it?
BLKRCAT
75% Film
this is pretty outrageous. I would be fuming as the seconds tick away with seemingly nothing to do.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
I'm getting angry just reading about this. There must be something the rightful owner can do!
raid
Dad Photographer
I tried to post something on the ebay "community" board, but I was told that I did not have such privileges.
Leica All Day
Veteran
Dan is a very good friend of mine. I am going to show him this thread. Thanks a lot for starting this thread .
xmas_one
Established
$65,100 at auction end
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
Well odd. $65,100 USD is very odd.
Does anyone know why such a crazy number? Could we suspect money laundering?
Does anyone know why such a crazy number? Could we suspect money laundering?
Corran
Well-known
It's quite simple, this story inspired a lot of people to shill bid up to a ridiculous number. They won't be paying for it obviously. Therefore it won't get "sold" on to someone else, further entangling the problem (a.k.a. who is left holding the bag).
My question here is whether the original owner had it insured and if he's already gotten compensation for the lens through their insurance. If so, probably best to just let it go.
My question here is whether the original owner had it insured and if he's already gotten compensation for the lens through their insurance. If so, probably best to just let it go.
Chuffed Cheese
Established
But if you have a card on file with eBay, how do you even begin to avoid the ****storm of the seller arguing that they sent back a brick? Unless you say "they sent me a brick, I want my money back". I imagine they'd just charge you the balance.
there is no mechanism in place for that. eBay refunds no matter what as long as the package is delivered back to the seller.
farlymac
PF McFarland
Well, somebody kept covering the bid, except for a short period when it was at $668. I'm of the opinion that the "winner" is a shill for the fencer, and they had someone on the bait who just had to have that lens, thus the $100 winning margin.
It might go back up for bidding pretty soon, would be something to look out for.
PF
It might go back up for bidding pretty soon, would be something to look out for.
PF
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.