Success with Jupiter-3

Also note, the Jupi 3 is a sonnar design, focus shift is inherent to the formula/design. Even the modern incarnation has it.

While that is true, the difference is between around 6cm worst case for the shift vs. almost three times as much for the Leica/Canon difference. Just saying.
 
While that is true, the difference is between around 6cm worst case for the shift vs. almost three times as much for the Leica/Canon difference. Just saying.

Never never did I have that much error, and I have had 3 jupi 3s and a lot more 8s so far.

18cm backfocus is huuuuge, shimming such a lens would render it practically useless wide open from even 5m onwards.
 
My most favored J3 is the one of the latest production year 1987 since it has beautiful amber coatings and a black barrel which looks much better IMHO than the ones made with the bare aluminium lens barrels: it provides also more contrast than early lenses.
i second what ron wrote about the later black jupiter-3 lenses. we have two from the same batch, funnily enough -- mine's got the serial number 870432.
awesome lens.
 
The reason I started this thread was because no one seems to be able to agree on whether or not there is a problem with the Jupiter-3. Considering it is a very fast lens, even for a 50mm, and there seems to be unanimous agreement sample variation can be wide with FSU equipment overall, I suppose that's why there's so much discord. I would also like to see a 1991 example, that sounds really late. My Jupiter-8-1 is from 1992, and on the Zorki-6 I tested it on, it works like a dream.
 
Tim, these are amazing portraits, especially the first one. Would you mind sharing which camera you use and what Aperture you use? I am learning how to use it on Fuji X-E1. Quick snap using f1.5 and 6400 is a bit disappointing (indoor at night).

Thanks. These were shot either with an M8 or M8.2. The headshots were done around f/5.6. The shot of my father in law playing the guitar was shot wide open, probably at ISO 640.
I find the lens generally works pretty well wide open.

Here is another, shot in studio. Either at f/2 or f/1.4.
Just a cool portrait lens, in my opinion.

4372376648_b4e75cc08b_z.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom