summicron 40-c, I finally get it.

Hmmm, funny, but it doesn't look as small as I thought it would. Instead, it looks like it was made for the ZI! Even the white lettering matches nicely. And I'm sure it makes the ZI a much more unobtrusive or pocketable camera. Thanks for posting the pic triplefinger.
 
I think the 40mm Summicron/Rokkor is the best value in Leica M mount lenses. Good shot, (would be a killer without the white cup in front in the middle.)
 
Last edited:
FrankS said:
I think the 40mm Summicron/Rokkor is the best value in Leica M mount lenses. Good shot, would be better without the white cup in front in the middle.

I absolutely agree. I've got one of each. Got the Rokkor as a less expensive alternative to a 35 cron for my M6 and the cron came with my CL. And I've been reading comments lately about how close they match the look of the 35 pre-asph"bokeh king." Just unbeatable when you compare them pricewise.
 
And I want that elusive 100/3.5 that I can't afford to round out my Canon P set.

I have to admit that there is a certain sexiness to the black Ikon.
 
Some good results there.

It is a great lens, I've always gotten good technical results from it but the FL just isn't for me. I want either longer or shorter, but 40 just doesn't work for me.

William
 
raid said:
I was going to sell my 40mm Summicron, but after this thread I may not.

Raid

Considering that the 40 'cron does most of the work of $800 50 'crons and $1000 35 'crons . . . . I wouldn't even think about selling it. It's great on the CLE and not hard at all to get used to on an M4-P.
 
Back
Top Bottom