Summicron 50mm v3 opinions

[jtlns]

Hi all,

I got the opportunity to buy the Summicron 50mm f2 "type 3" for a decent price (around $600). Since it's a recent version, I did some research and I found out:
- the focus throw is longer (compared to other Summicrons)
- the resolution is not that high

Do you think (mainly the first point) would be a drawback to consider when using the lens on a M6 (for now, maybe in the future a digital body)? How much longer would be the focus throw?

Thanks!!
Jan

 

[x-ray]

I owned v3 back when they were in production. Focus throw, no problem. It not that much different than the V2. As to resolution, it's quite sharp and has better contrast and especially less flare than the v2. I've owned the v1, 2, 3 and 4 and used them on hundreds of assignments. Let's say I wouldn't hesitate to buy a v3 now and use it with clients.

 

[Youalwayzlooksocool]

I bought a v3 two weeks ago, i'm not normally one for long focus throws, but it's perfectly bearable in actual use, so don't worry about that. I can't speak for optical results until I get my scans back, but will chip in then!

 

[Iestrada]

If I am not mistaken, longer focus throw give a greater focusing accuracy. As far as resolution, attached is the link to an image thread for you to decide for yourself.

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121952

I chose the V3 for the ergonomics.

 

[Daryl J.]

My V.3 'Chron is not for sale. So that should say something. And $600 for a 'cron is a great buy. Mine was $900 two years ago for the record and has a bit of a wobbly aperture ring.

The limits are more the 35mm format instead of the lens IMHO.

 

[michaelwj]

I owned one for about a year, and agree with all the above. The focus throw is longer, but suits a lens without a focus tab. It's not too long either. As for resolution, it is sharp without being too clinical. In my opinion, it's a nice balance between classic and modern.
I sold it as 50s just aren't for me - I didn't get another 50.

 

[alonbenav]

I have one glued to an M5 and it's fantastic.

A few I've made with this lens of my new puppy:
Oona 1

Oona 2

Oona 3

Oona 4

These Two

I paid $750 for mine. At $600 you can't really go wrong. It's a Leica Summicron after all.

 

[peterm1]

I have had one for 20 years. The length of the focus throw has never been an issue for me nor indeed have I ever thought about it but on reflection of course I would say its a positive if anything as it provides more accurate focus. In short its not noticeably longer throw. And anyway I seldom use my M in situations where rapid focusing is essential. I would not say its low resolution. Maybe by comparison with later Summicrons it could be but no otherwise. But there tends to be a price paid for sharper images beyond a certain point - many later lenses that are very, very sharp (eg with aspherical elements) have less attractive bokeh. And this version generally has pretty nice bokeh in most situations. I will also say it is contrasty by comparison with earlier Summicrons which adds to apparent resolution. For example I used to also own a close focus version from the 1950s which was sharp but distinctly less contrasty. By comparison this one displays considerable contrast and if you are shooting black and white you will not get a "classic" black and white look with this lens. It provides a more "modern" look.

In short there is very little if anything I would say bad about this lens. Certainly there is nothing I would complain about from the images shot below using it.

Danny by Life in Shadows, on Flickr

Adelaide food market 7 by Life in Shadows, on Flickr

Adelaide market by Life in Shadows, on Flickr

Adelaide food market 6 by Life in Shadows, on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

It's a beautiful lens. A good one for $600 is a steal.

 

[dleyva2]

You can't go wrong.

 

[pepeguitarra]

I have the Cron 1, 2 (rigid and DR), and the 5. They are all super-fantastic.