Bingley
Veteran
Erik, Thank you. You owe youself a trip to Stockholm. A very beautiful city. Of course, Amsterdam is beautiful too, but very different.
Bingley
Veteran
BTW, that looks like a very clean Summitar. Enjoy!!
Bingley
Veteran
02Pilot
Malcontent
karlin
Well-known
A couple from a recent trip to Downeast Maine. 1949 Summitar, Leica IIIc, FP4+ in Caffenol C-H(RS).
Great images!
Ade-oh
Well-known
Taken with my uncoated 1946 Summitar on my IIIc body:

robert blu
quiet photographer
interesting thread, good photos. Now if I would like to have one is anything to be careful when buying? Is a price in the range 350/400 EUR correct for this kind of lens? Any serial number to avoid? Or to look for?
robert
robert
02Pilot
Malcontent
Great images!
Thanks, Karlin.
Robert, personally my preference would be for the 10-blade aperture over the 6-blade, but beyond that relatively minor consideration I think it's simply condition. I would think that, with some patience, you could find a nice Summitar for somewhat less than the price range you suggest.
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
At 350/400 Euro you could by one in very good condition.
The 6-blade aperture supposedly reduces vignetting in the corners better then the 10-blade version does. I don't really see it.
Uncoated Summitar, Fomapan 100, There is some slight shutter drag on this IIIcK
The 6-blade aperture supposedly reduces vignetting in the corners better then the 10-blade version does. I don't really see it.
Uncoated Summitar, Fomapan 100, There is some slight shutter drag on this IIIcK

Bingley
Veteran
Coated Summitar (1949), Leica IIIc, TMax 400, HC 110 dil. h:
Keizersgracht by bingley0522, on Flickr

Bingley
Veteran
Thanks, Karlin.
Robert, personally my preference would be for the 10-blade aperture over the 6-blade, but beyond that relatively minor consideration I think it's simply condition. I would think that, with some patience, you could find a nice Summitar for somewhat less than the price range you suggest.
I agree. All three Summitars I've purchased (still own two) were acquired from members here, so they do come up from time to time. Prices run in the $250 to 350 US range. The pre-war versions are uncoated (unless coated later); clean samples can be incredibly fine. The very late serial numbers are actually prototype collapsible Summicrons, and are likely to fetch higher prices. Those considerations aside, the key is sample quality. The Summitar is a beautifully constructed lens. I think it's easier today to find a clean sample than it is to find a clean collapsible 'cron.
robert blu
quiet photographer
Thanks, 250-350 $ (=EUR) is ok with my budget for this GAS attack ! But I need to find something in Europe in order to avoid duty cost. Where I live I had to pay duty also on the shipment cost!
Now, waiting for a few more pictures to enjoy...
robert
Now, waiting for a few more pictures to enjoy...
robert
Bingley
Veteran
Coated Summitar (1949), Leica IIIc, TMax 400, HC 110 dil. h:
Prinsengracht by bingley0522, on Flickr

unclepiak
Newbie
Bingley
Veteran
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Beautiful, Jon, like impressionistic painting. Coated?
Erik.
Erik.
Thanks Erik! My Summitar is uncoated.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Coincidence! I have today an uncoated Summitar (508151) on my Leica III, but B+W inside.
Erik.
Erik.
Bingley
Veteran
Coated or uncoated, Summitars are great!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.