Imakebadphotos
Established
Has anyone used either one of these lenses before? What is your opinion on them? I heard good things about both of them, and I want to buy one of them, but I haven't seen that many reviews to make up my mind.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I would just flip a coin and go with that.
Both are great lenses, although I find Rokkor lenses the closest to the classic German lenses in the way they draw out of all the Japanese lens makers and that is a plus IMO.
Both are great lenses, although I find Rokkor lenses the closest to the classic German lenses in the way they draw out of all the Japanese lens makers and that is a plus IMO.
Imakebadphotos
Established
I would just flip a coin and go with that.
Both are great lenses, although I find Rokkor lenses the closest to the classic German lenses in the way they draw out of all the Japanese lens makers and that is a plus IMO.
thanks for the input. I am leaning more to the Rokkor lens, I'm trying to find myself one non-leica LTM 50mm that gives a good image quality.
WJJ3
Well-known
thanks for the input. I am leaning more to the Rokkor lens, I'm trying to find myself one non-leica LTM 50mm that gives a good image quality.
You might want to consider the Nikkor H 5cm f2 as well. It’s a great 50 that is available for reasonable prices.
Peter Jennings
Well-known
Pretty much all lenses in this category give good to excellent image quality. It really comes down to what you prefer - both in how the lens handles and how it renders. I had copy of the Rokkor, and it gave great images. The lens was rather large and heavy compared to others and therefore I sold it. The Canon f/1.8 is also a good one that I have had that gave great results. The fast LTM 50s that I still have are the Nikkor f/2, Hexanon f/1.9, and Canon f/1.5.
cassel
Well-known
I have the Super Rokkor now and use it regularly....
Never had the Fujinon. I really enjoy the Rokkor - it is more of a modern looking and handling lens than the others discussed here. I like that it is a bit bigger and that it's black - but, then, I bought it to pair with my black Canon 7.
Image quality is great -highly recommend!
My other fav 50 is the Canon f1.5
Never had the Fujinon. I really enjoy the Rokkor - it is more of a modern looking and handling lens than the others discussed here. I like that it is a bit bigger and that it's black - but, then, I bought it to pair with my black Canon 7.
Image quality is great -highly recommend!
My other fav 50 is the Canon f1.5
james.liam
Well-known
thanks for the input. I am leaning more to the Rokkor lens, I'm trying to find myself one non-leica LTM 50mm that gives a good image quality.
You ought to seriously consider a Canon 50/1.8 LTM. First-rate, plentiful and inexpensive.
Pioneer
Veteran
Don't know about the Rokkor 50/1.8 ltm but I do have a nice little Rokkor 45/2.8 ltm lens that I enjoy a lot. Of course it isn't as fast as the f/1.8 lens but it is small, light and very easy to handle. It also takes great pictures as do most Rokkor lenses in my opinion.
Imakebadphotos
Established
You might want to consider the Nikkor H 5cm f2 as well. It’s a great 50 that is available for reasonable prices.
hmm, I see some nice reviews about this lens I will check it out. thanks
dourbalistar
Buy more film
hmm, I see some nice reviews about this lens I will check it out. thanks
OP, any particular reason why you settled on either the Super Rokkor 50mm f/1.8 LTM or Fujinon 50mm f/2 LTM?
If you're doing some research on the Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 LTM, there's a nice thread with lots of image samples here on the forum:
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90034
Imakebadphotos
Established
You ought to seriously consider a Canon 50/1.8 LTM. First-rate, plentiful and inexpensive.
so I am new to using an LTM camera and new to photography in general. when I looked up the Canon 1.8, I am shocked as to how affordable it is. To be honest, I thought it wouldn't be a good of a lens because of how little is being asked for it. why is that?
Imakebadphotos
Established
OP, any particular reason why you settled on either the Super Rokkor 50mm f/1.8 LTM or Fujinon 50mm f/2 LTM?
If you're doing some research on the Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 LTM, there's a nice thread with lots of image samples here on the forum:
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90034
a few google searches somehow brought me up to the super Rokkor and then later the Fujinon and I never heard of them nor heard much about them though I did like there designs. in new to the world of LTM and I never heard of that brand before. in my ignorance, the main brands I constantly see are Leica, canon, and the FED Jupiter lenses.
james.liam
Well-known
so I am new to using an LTM camera and new to photography in general. when I looked up the Canon 1.8, I am shocked as to how affordable it is. To be honest, I thought it wouldn't be a good of a lens because of how little is being asked for it. why is that?
It's a great lens, don't let the price sway you. A sleeper lens, it was produced in much higher numbers than the ƒ/1.4, 1.2 and 0.95 versions of the 50 and more likely used by amateurs so they're not as beaten up. This is a great lens to dip your toes into legacy LTM glass
It's faster and smaller than the lenses you're looking for; the ones you mention were made in smaller runs and rarity accounts for some of the higher prices.
If you go searching for a 50/1.8, get one of the later ones, typically black and chrome rather than all-chrome.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
a few google searches somehow brought me up to the super Rokkor and then later the Fujinon and I never heard of them nor heard much about them though I did like there designs. in new to the world of LTM and I never heard of that brand before. in my ignorance, the main brands I constantly see are Leica, canon, and the FED Jupiter lenses.
The Head Bartender (aka site host) has a pretty comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of LTM lenses and manufacturers:
https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm
The Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 was my entry into the world of LTM lenses, and I now own several others. Lots of wonderful and unique lenses to choose from.
james.liam
Well-known
As addendum, the Nikkor ƒ/2 and ƒ/1.4 are both Sonnar designs, tend to focus shift stopped down. The Canon ƒ/1.8 and ƒ/1.4 are not a Sonnar design, IIRC. The rendering will be different. The Nikons are optimized for near-focus & wide-open apertures, the Canons, not so much.
Recall that the ƒ/1.4 LTM is the lens that 'made' Nippon Kogaku. The rest is history...
Recall that the ƒ/1.4 LTM is the lens that 'made' Nippon Kogaku. The rest is history...
dourbalistar
Buy more film
As addendum, the Nikkor ƒ/2 and ƒ/1.4 are both Sonnar designs, tend to focus shift stopped down. The Canon ƒ/1.8 and ƒ/1.4 are not a Sonnar design, IIRC. The rendering will be different. The Nikons are optimized for near-focus, the Canons, not so much.
Yes, the lens designs are different. OP, there are also image threads here on the forum for the Canon 50/1.8 and the Canon 50/1.4. Hopefully that can give you an idea of what the lenses are capable of, and the image quality.
hilltime
Well-known
I have both and I would agree with (Xayraa33), find you best option, quality and price, and go with it, as in my experience, I couldn't necessarily tell the
difference between them, although I do believe I paid slightly more for the Fujinon. As an aside, Minolta made the same lens 50/1.8, for their Super A series of cameras, which can usually sell for half the price of a LTM 50/1.8 Rokkor. I don't recall you saying what type of body you'd be using the lens on? Film LTM or Digital...
difference between them, although I do believe I paid slightly more for the Fujinon. As an aside, Minolta made the same lens 50/1.8, for their Super A series of cameras, which can usually sell for half the price of a LTM 50/1.8 Rokkor. I don't recall you saying what type of body you'd be using the lens on? Film LTM or Digital...
Imakebadphotos
Established
I have both and I would agree with (Xayraa33), find you best option, quality and price, and go with it, as in my experience, I couldn't necessarily tell the
difference between them, although I do believe I paid slightly more for the Fujinon. As an aside, Minolta made the same lens 50/1.8, for their Super A series of cameras, which can usually sell for half the price of a LTM 50/1.8 Rokkor. I don't recall you saying what type of body you'd be using the lens on? Film LTM or Digital...
I'm currently using a canon Vl-L film camera that I found at a local thrift store. it only came with a canon 35mm f2.8, but no 50mm. given the advice from others on here, I'm looking at other alternatives but down the line, I will check out the Rokkor.
Imakebadphotos
Established
ah okay, that makes sense. in that case, I will look into the more accessible lenses and down the road, I'll check out the rare lenses like the rokkor. thanks.It's a great lens, don't let the price sway you. A sleeper lens, it was produced in much higher numbers than the ƒ/1.4, 1.2 and 0.95 versions of the 50 and more likely used by amateurs so they're not as beaten up. This is a great lens to dip your toes into legacy LTM glass
It's faster and smaller than the lenses you're looking for; the ones you mention were made in smaller runs and rarity accounts for some of the higher prices.
If you go searching for a 50/1.8, get one of the later ones, typically black and chrome rather than all-chrome.
Imakebadphotos
Established
The Head Bartender (aka site host) has a pretty comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of LTM lenses and manufacturers:
https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm
The Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 was my entry into the world of LTM lenses, and I now own several others. Lots of wonderful and unique lenses to choose from.
wow it is easy to get lost down the rabbit hole for this lens system. thanks
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.