Imakebadphotos
Established
Has anyone used either one of these lenses before? What is your opinion on them? I heard good things about both of them, and I want to buy one of them, but I haven't seen that many reviews to make up my mind.
I would just flip a coin and go with that.
Both are great lenses, although I find Rokkor lenses the closest to the classic German lenses in the way they draw out of all the Japanese lens makers and that is a plus IMO.
thanks for the input. I am leaning more to the Rokkor lens, I'm trying to find myself one non-leica LTM 50mm that gives a good image quality.
thanks for the input. I am leaning more to the Rokkor lens, I'm trying to find myself one non-leica LTM 50mm that gives a good image quality.
You might want to consider the Nikkor H 5cm f2 as well. It’s a great 50 that is available for reasonable prices.
hmm, I see some nice reviews about this lens I will check it out. thanks
You ought to seriously consider a Canon 50/1.8 LTM. First-rate, plentiful and inexpensive.
OP, any particular reason why you settled on either the Super Rokkor 50mm f/1.8 LTM or Fujinon 50mm f/2 LTM?
If you're doing some research on the Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 LTM, there's a nice thread with lots of image samples here on the forum:
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90034
so I am new to using an LTM camera and new to photography in general. when I looked up the Canon 1.8, I am shocked as to how affordable it is. To be honest, I thought it wouldn't be a good of a lens because of how little is being asked for it. why is that?
a few google searches somehow brought me up to the super Rokkor and then later the Fujinon and I never heard of them nor heard much about them though I did like there designs. in new to the world of LTM and I never heard of that brand before. in my ignorance, the main brands I constantly see are Leica, canon, and the FED Jupiter lenses.
As addendum, the Nikkor ƒ/2 and ƒ/1.4 are both Sonnar designs, tend to focus shift stopped down. The Canon ƒ/1.8 and ƒ/1.4 are not a Sonnar design, IIRC. The rendering will be different. The Nikons are optimized for near-focus, the Canons, not so much.
I have both and I would agree with (Xayraa33), find you best option, quality and price, and go with it, as in my experience, I couldn't necessarily tell the
difference between them, although I do believe I paid slightly more for the Fujinon. As an aside, Minolta made the same lens 50/1.8, for their Super A series of cameras, which can usually sell for half the price of a LTM 50/1.8 Rokkor. I don't recall you saying what type of body you'd be using the lens on? Film LTM or Digital...
ah okay, that makes sense. in that case, I will look into the more accessible lenses and down the road, I'll check out the rare lenses like the rokkor. thanks.It's a great lens, don't let the price sway you. A sleeper lens, it was produced in much higher numbers than the ƒ/1.4, 1.2 and 0.95 versions of the 50 and more likely used by amateurs so they're not as beaten up. This is a great lens to dip your toes into legacy LTM glass
It's faster and smaller than the lenses you're looking for; the ones you mention were made in smaller runs and rarity accounts for some of the higher prices.
If you go searching for a 50/1.8, get one of the later ones, typically black and chrome rather than all-chrome.
The Head Bartender (aka site host) has a pretty comprehensive, but not exhaustive, list of LTM lenses and manufacturers:
https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm
The Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 was my entry into the world of LTM lenses, and I now own several others. Lots of wonderful and unique lenses to choose from.