SWC with 220 film

Some rolls displayed a light leak at the edges, and I am assuming it is the film and not the 220 back since some rolls did not display such streaks.

see below:

02-016-XL.jpg


02-019-XL.jpg


02-018-XL.jpg


02-015crop-XL.jpg


(my hand?)

02-015-XL.jpg
 
Thanks. This is (very) expired Fuji 160 NPS with some post-processing.

The original scans are low contrast and faded.
 
Lots of wonderful shots there, Raid. That's a very nice lens on your SWC.

I've not had much luck with expired Fuji films. If they haven't been frozen, a color shift is usually what one gets. Yours are not doing that, but maybe you can bracket a shot at the head of the roll to see where it is going. Then you can figure all your films with that expiry date will need the same ISO adjustment. The B&W stuff is great, exposures seem fine on them.

PF
 
Thanks. I used post-processing to improve the scans. The XP2 was in a better shape than the Fuji NPS 160.
 
Overall, I am happy about the results with my SWC. I learned quickly how to use the camera and I used both the 220 back and the 120 back. Both backs worked well for me.
 
I asked the hotel receptionist to give me a room at the highest floor possible, and he gave me the top floor. This was in Cambridge, Boston. The cars looked like toys from the balcony. After a few days of rain, we got a sunny day. I took two photos in total darkness, using a small tripod somehow, even though it was not large enough to be stabilized on the balcony floor. The SWC is quite flexible, and it allowed me to take photos around me as I explored Cambridge for a few days.
 
I have one roll of 220 film that is way underexposed. I tried to save the images with postprocessing.
I met a man fishing, and an older man just enjoying the views and the sunset.


0x1-008-XL.jpg


x01-007-XL.jpg


x01-005-XL.jpg


x01-001-XL.jpg


x01-002-XL.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom