Telewatt
Telewatt
feenej said:
....
....it is forbidden...Tuolumne
Veteran
Get a good used dSLR. The Nikon D200 should be attractively priced now that the D300 is out. I agree with the various statements about digital knocking the socks off film at high ISOs, especially in B&W where digital noise tends to show less. Also, if you are doing alot of freebie or cheapie weddings, your processing costs will be near zero with digital.
/T
/T
Tuolumne
Veteran
Telewatt said:sorry to hear your problems...
go for a real B/W Film with 1600 ASA ...take the Fuji 1600, it is a real good film to do that...and than in EMOFIN you will pull of all the stops!....
I'm new here but you can see 5 Pictures now in my "Picturebook"..
good luck!
regards,
Jan
Telewatt,
What is EMOFIN?
/T
MRohlfing
Well-known
jamiewakeham said:
Do not buy a Nokton! Buy a NOCTILUX! It is MUCH faster :angel:
Michael
buckpago
Established
theres only one thing to do.. expose it properly. aye.
Telewatt
Telewatt
Tuolumne said:
EMOFIN is a developer from TETENAL.
It is a two step fine-grain developer for maximum speed yield. (or to get the contrast down..)..gives good detail especially shots into the light..ecepttionally fine grain..
regards,
Jan
Tuolumne
Veteran
It does not appear to be available in the US.Telewatt said:
/T
Telewatt
Telewatt
Tuolumne said:
..there must be a "clone" available in the US...I can't remember the name..
regards,
Jan
Tuolumne
Veteran
There is a two-step D-76 developer. That's all I can find a reference to.
/T
/T
ferider
Veteran
MRohlfing said:
Faster in what way ?
- hand-holdability ? No.
- DOF at close focus ? No.
- Image quality wide open ? No.
- Faster to empy your wallet ? Yes ... priceless.
Unfortunately I cann't tell anybody not to buy the 35 Nokton. I'm lusting myself ...
Asking the goat to be gardener as we say in German ...
Roland.
Ororaro
Well-known
ferider said:
Funny, I'd answer "yes" to all.
foto_fool
Well-known
I think Emofin is similar to Diafine - the formulations are the same and you gain a stop in development with both.
I have been shooting Delta 3200 at box speed and developing in DDX - and getting much smoother tonality, lower contrast and fewer blown highlights than I have been able to achieve with Neopan 1600.
The only wedding I have done recently was on a rainy day last April - not a lot of light to work with. I shot Efke 400 and Fomapan 400 with a 35mm Summilux ASPH on the M6 and the results were very good IMHO - the bride and groom liked them as well.
Someone mentioned the 40mm Nokton. This would be a good choice to carry around all day. The 35/1.2 is as big and heavy as a soda can.
I have been shooting Delta 3200 at box speed and developing in DDX - and getting much smoother tonality, lower contrast and fewer blown highlights than I have been able to achieve with Neopan 1600.
The only wedding I have done recently was on a rainy day last April - not a lot of light to work with. I shot Efke 400 and Fomapan 400 with a 35mm Summilux ASPH on the M6 and the results were very good IMHO - the bride and groom liked them as well.
Someone mentioned the 40mm Nokton. This would be a good choice to carry around all day. The 35/1.2 is as big and heavy as a soda can.
kevin m
Veteran
And you'd be incorrect on every count.
Your pics speak for themselves, Ned.
Nokton48
Veteran
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Don't buy a 35mm Nokton.
Ororaro
Well-known
kevin m said:And you'd be incorrect on every count.
Your pics speak for themselves, Ned.
okay, so please enumerate.
parsec1
parsec1
Hold your Leica tightly and tell everybody " for gods sake STAND STILL" !!!
Ororaro
Well-known
parsec1 said:
Well you know, any lens becomes a Noctilux with the right film DOH!
Quite frankly, this is tiring. Trying to create a myth that lens A or lens B is faster and better then the Noctilux because it has a wider angle of field or closer focus is like saying a lada is as good as a Mercedes because "see, they both have 4 wheels!".
A secret between me and you: The summarit 50 2.5 is faster then the Noctilux if you underexpose your shots by 3 stops with it. Okay? So why spend the dough on a Noctilux?
LeicaM3
Well-known
jamiewakeham said:
Jamie,
IYP I would consider a 50/1.5 Nokton and TX @1250 in Diafine, it is a combo that I use with my M3 a lot. The 35/1.2 is certainly an outstanding lens (I have used it, but don't own it), but the 50 is very flare resistant in my experience (more than my 'cron) and a great value - even more so than the 35.
TX @ 1250 in Diafine is better than Neopan 1600 from my experience.
Good Luck, don't get stressed, have fun.
Telewatt
Telewatt
foto_fool said:I think Emofin is similar to Diafine - the formulations are the same and you gain a stop in development with both.
I have been shooting Delta 3200 at box speed and developing in DDX - and getting much smoother tonality, lower contrast and fewer blown highlights than I have been able to achieve with Neopan 1600.
The only wedding I have done recently was on a rainy day last April - not a lot of light to work with. I shot Efke 400 and Fomapan 400 with a 35mm Summilux ASPH on the M6 and the results were very good IMHO - the bride and groom liked them as well.
Someone mentioned the 40mm Nokton. This would be a good choice to carry around all day. The 35/1.2 is as big and heavy as a soda can.
This could be the developer, but I'm no shure.....a Photographer of the "Leica Forum" told me, that he has bought a similar developer in US...
You picture is fine, but to low contrast now for me....the best of this developer is you get all the shadows and the highlights together....and if it is to low, you can go harder but you do not lost anything!...
Regards,
Jan
MRohlfing
Well-known
Nokton48 said:
That sounds really strange from a person whose name is 'Nokton48'
Does that name indicate you are owner of 48 Noktons?
Do you want to have them all and nobody else should use that fine lens?
Michael