That old thing about Leicas being stealthy...

I have decided on purely mindless exercise, I will photograph any Leica shooter that i come across. I want to find out how prevalent Leica use is and either debunk or affirm the theory that most Leica owners are on the internet and very few on the streets... And the best part about photographing photographers are that they cannot object otherwise they'll appear hypocritical. It should be fun in a nerdy way.

Go to the Rencontres at Arles. You'll have your work cut out. I've never seen so many Leicas in use (or at least, being carried) in one place.

Cheers,

R.
 
Well, Joel Meyerowitz reckons he becomes invisible when using his Leica on the streets of New York, so they must be good 'cos he's at least 6 foot 6 inches tall.......!!
 
Another vote for the photographer's attitude and shooting style as being the most important factor. As for gear, while you can shoot almost any subject with almost any camera, and the photographer's skill is most important here, some gear is better than other gear for different purposes. (I've heard this called: Horses for Courses.) There isn't anything special about Leica in particular; it is one of the smaller less intimidating to strangers types of cameras that are best for this purpose. IMO, Leica is one of the better RF style cameras - smoother and quieter than most, and built to a high standard (hence the price).

As for my "cynical" comment, I don't see the rationality of bashing/picking on photographers using any particular brand of equipment and dismiss them all as fondlers and "not real" photographers. While I am sure there are some people who buy items with the intent of displaying their wealth and status instead of for the original purpose of the item, they may just as well be buying monster dSLR's with huge zooms, or luxury cars, or sports cars which can never be driven to their capabilities on public roads. These expressions of opulence would be much more effective for such a display, being more obvious and meaningful to a larger segment of the population, as opposed to a Leica. So please, let's stop making unsupportable sweeping disparaging generalizations.
 
Last edited:
As for my "cynical" comment, I don't see the rationality of bashing/picking on photographers using any particular brand of equipment and dismiss them all as fondlers and "not real" photographers.

Frank, my opinion is based solely in what I have seen around me. It is my opinion, and I am entitled to it- as you are entitled to call it cynical- and now, lacking rationale. As there are some things you "don't see", I also fail to see how calling someone cynical, or questioning his rationality differs from brand-bashing. Nevertheless, I am OK with it- not all of us think alike, thankfully.

But I must voice my concern at your lumping the act of bashing- picking on-dismissing anyone with my "cynical" comment. I have not, I repeat, not bashed, picked on, or dismissed anybody. Wanting attention is a normal human need, and there is absolutely nothing wrong, IMHO, in wanting to be noticed. In fact, I find a little worrying that we are so serious about photography (or any other activity) that we must deny our human side.

I happen to have seen a lot of people wearing Leicas as jewelry. And so I say it. With that, I am in no way dimishing them- au contraire, more power to them. It is one of the better kinds of jewelry extant.

In all probability, those who use cameras (any kind of camera) as necklaces are not present in great numbers here at RFF- but RFF is a tiny little bit of the world. Anyone can say that their experience is different from mine, but we hardly can question the accuracy of somebody's perception- I see many cameras carried as necklaces, you don't- who is right? More to the point, who is to say who is right? I am no yet conceited enough to speak about absolutes, but I voice my opinions.
 
Frank, my opinion is based solely in what I have seen around me. It is my opinion, and I am entitled to it- as you are entitled to call it cynical- and now, lacking rationale. As there are some things you "don't see", I also fail to see how calling someone cynical, or questioning his rationality differs from brand-bashing. Nevertheless, I am OK with it- not all of us think alike, thankfully.

But I must voice my concern at your lumping the act of bashing- picking on-dismissing anyone with my "cynical" comment. I have not, I repeat, not bashed, picked on, or dismissed anybody. Wanting attention is a normal human need, and there is absolutely nothing wrong, IMHO, in wanting to be noticed. In fact, I find a little worrying that we are so serious about photography (or any other activity) that we must deny our human side.

I happen to have seen a lot of people wearing Leicas as jewelry. And so I say it. With that, I am in no way dimishing them- au contraire, more power to them. It is one of the better kinds of jewelry extant.

In all probability, those who use cameras (any kind of camera) as necklaces are not present in great numbers here at RFF- but RFF is a tiny little bit of the world. Anyone can say that their experience is different from mine, but we hardly can question the accuracy of somebody's perception- I see many cameras carried as necklaces, you don't- who is right? More to the point, who is to say who is right? I am no yet conceited enough to speak about absolutes, but I voice my opinions.

Cynical is a side of Frank I have not seen in his past comments, is it possible you are misunderstanding this one?
 
Frank, my opinion is based solely in what I have seen around me. It is my opinion, and I am entitled to it- as you are entitled to call it cynical- and now, lacking rationale. As there are some things you "don't see", I also fail to see how calling someone cynical, or questioning his rationality differs from brand-bashing. Nevertheless, I am OK with it- not all of us think alike, thankfully.

But I must voice my concern at your lumping the act of bashing- picking on-dismissing anyone with my "cynical" comment. I have not, I repeat, not bashed, picked on, or dismissed anybody. Wanting attention is a normal human need, and there is absolutely nothing wrong, IMHO, in wanting to be noticed. In fact, I find a little worrying that we are so serious about photography (or any other activity) that we must deny our human side.

I happen to have seen a lot of people wearing Leicas as jewelry. And so I say it. With that, I am in no way dimishing them- au contraire, more power to them. It is one of the better kinds of jewelry extant.

In all probability, those who use cameras (any kind of camera) as necklaces are not present in great numbers here at RFF- but RFF is a tiny little bit of the world. Anyone can say that their experience is different from mine, but we hardly can question the accuracy of somebody's perception- I see many cameras carried as necklaces, you don't- who is right? More to the point, who is to say who is right? I am no yet conceited enough to speak about absolutes, but I voice my opinions.

But 99%? A bit over the top. Half, maybe, but even then, I'd dispute it.

In fact, maybe it suggests that Leicas are actually quite unobtrusive. Consider the following premises and conclusions:

PREMISES

You personally see people carrying Leicas.

and

You personally don't see people taking pictures with their Leicas.

CONCLUSIONS

They don't take pics with their Leicas

or

They are sufficiently unobtrusive that when they do, you don't see it

I carried a Leica at Arles all last week, and came back with 200+ pictures. Does this make me a jewellery-carrier, or someone who uses a Leica both to take 'pretty pictures' (probably a more honourable term than 'fine art') and as a notebook?

Cheers,

R.
 
Last edited:
I know that these cameras are certainly more discreet than SLRs of any type. But I maintain that the supposed clandestine nature of the M or RFs in general is wildly overstated.

Of course a rf will stand out in a sea of cell phones, but so will a canon s95. Times have changed since slrs came to prominance in the late 50's/ early sixties.

Most of the elements that made the leica alluring over the decades are now done better by cheap mass market gizmos. In comparison to a point and shoot or iphone, leicas are obtrusive and loud.

That's just fine in my book. My leica takes kick ass photos and it gives me immense pleasure every time I use it. I can't say the same for my s90, iphone, ricoh gxr or my contax slr.
 
In my neck of the woods very few people even know what a Leica is. When I am spotted on the street most people think my M6 is worthless since it is a film camera.
Other way around with my Olympus E5. But I agree my M6 isn't slealthy by todays standards with the m4/3rd, X100 and the Nex cameras.
 
I used to feel conspicuous with my M3, but two forces have combined to make me invisible. First, I've gotten to be old. Most people can't see old people. I had a young woman walk right into me, and she was looking right at me! I just wasn't on her radar. It's also true that when one gets older he's just not as "self" conmscious as when younger.
Second, I swapped my 'cron DR for a Summaron 35mm 2.8 with eyes, and now I can walk right up to people and shoot a picture, and they just don't see me or my camera.
Truth is indeed stranger than fiction! I think my Leica is pretty stealthy.
 
Roger: I should have used an emoticon to denote that my 99% estimate was 99% (more like 50%) tongue-in cheek ;-)

Also, note that I am not implying that wanting to be noticed is incompatible with being a prolific, excellent photographer. Alas, some of the best-known artists have been some of the greatest carvers for attention, too.
 
There is almost a pathological dislike of Leica owners by a large chunk of photographers who use other equipment and there is a pathological drive in Leica owners to associate their self-esteem with their Leica gear. When you add these two together in internet forums the result is endless threads like this where some people feel attacking their gear choice is as bad as someone attacking their religion or ethnicity.

All of this waste of mental energy could be fixed if people posted more photos, talked more about photos and become photoholic rather than zuikoholic or Leicaholic or gearholic... People need to post more photos and less words... And every time they posted more words it should ring warning bells to them that creativly they have run dry so hence the chit chat.
 
Well, looks like everyone feels one way or the other. Tossing in my $0.02 worth with this story. At this year's jazz fest I had decided to not use my 80-200 f2.8 zoom opting instead for the new 35mm f1.8 AF-S G DX and an 85mm f1.8 AF-D pair. It was like I was a musician magnet! With everyone else, including fans, sporting the latest Canikon w/telephoto pro zooms I stuck out like a sore thumb!😱 I also shot with my latest acquisition, a Contax G2 w/45mm f2.0 and my dad's 1970's version of a Yashica Electro35 GS. My equipment was not what the other "pros" were using and my stealth was non-existent! In the end, I got some images I am very happy with and did not break my back dragging around the heavy zooms opting instead to use my feet. I did have one advantage in that I had an "all access" pass that allowed me anywhere for the 4-day event.😀
 
Back
Top Bottom