That old thing about Leicas being stealthy...

I find that if you are brave and quick that most people are too embarrassed and shy to say anything. So work quickly and move on.
These shots were taken with an old Canon 20D. If it all went pear-shaped I would throw the camera at them and RUN! 😀



By the way, I could not load up a higher resolution then 600x600. What am I doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Grafton Street_Dublin.jpg
    Grafton Street_Dublin.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 0
  • The Kiss_South King Street_13_07_11.jpg
    The Kiss_South King Street_13_07_11.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 0
... is a canard.

It's a duck? Like a mallard, mandarin or a wood duck? 😉


A few years ago I went out street shooting for the first time in, of all places, Paris.

(...)

Which, I thought, would actually aid in my covert task, but it didn't. Just the opposite, in fact. Whenever I pulled out my M6TTL, it became the most conspicuous object amongst a sea of tiny handhelds and cellphones. Two girls saw it and shouted "Leica!" because of its uniqueness. I was not expecting this.

I've never experienced this. I've been approached, but I've never had the camera being shouted at. Parisians are used to seeing all sorts of cameras...which leads me to believe you found two tourists.


But the Leica M, supposedly valued because it allows the photographer to be discreet, is an extremely serious-looking piece of equipment in comparison to what everybody else is carrying. It is larger, heavier, and more imposing, as small as it it. You can't help but be noticed.

It allows you to be, it doesn't make you discreet. Taking vitamin supplements allow you to be healthy, but the mere intake doesn't make you healthy. 🙂


So, does anyone else find it difficult to disappear when out shooting with one? Or is this just me?

No. The only time I've been really noticed is when I take out my Canon 70-200 L with the hood on. Now, talk about being self-conscious.
 
... is a canard. A few years ago I went out street shooting for the first time in, of all places, Paris. Where else to begin, right? On the Champs-Élysées, through side-street after side-street, neighborhood after neighborhood, it dawned on me that everybody had a camera. Either a small P&S or their phone. These technological advances have turned nearly everybody into, well, a reportage photographer. No other way to describe it. There is nothing unique about walking down the street and taking pictures anymore -- everybody does it.

Which, I thought, would actually aid in my covert task, but it didn't. Just the opposite, in fact. Whenever I pulled out my M6TTL, it became the most conspicuous object amongst a sea of tiny handhelds and cellphones. Two girls saw it and shouted "Leica!" because of its uniqueness. I was not expecting this. But the Leica M, supposedly valued because it allows the photographer to be discreet, is an extremely serious-looking piece of equipment in comparison to what everybody else is carrying. It is larger, heavier, and more imposing, as small as it it. You can't help but be noticed.

So, does anyone else find it difficult to disappear when out shooting with one? Or is this just me?

I have stated this before here in this forum.

These days, any camera which requires you to hold it up to your face, so that you are, in effect, blocking your eye contact with your subject (whoever or whatever that subject may be) will be noticed and it is, relatively, impossible to remain "invisible".

If you want to be covert, then shoot with an iPhone or arms length digital that has no viewfinder. These tools are ubiquitous, and , as you had stated EVERYONE has one. These are the tools with which you too can be "unobtrusive".

Cheers,
Dave
 
claacct, cool down - it's all in the funs ;-)

I guess, although this place is called rangefinderforum, I found, that most people here in fact use cameras from iPhones through RF's to large formats without any disgust on equipment.

You likely find a F3 in 50% of the peoples wardrobes or shooting bags here (leaning out of window wiiiiiide here).

You got me an idea, to maybe doctor a K'atschinnnnnng !!! shutter sound into my F3, which I barely use these days, belonging to the wardrobe crowd, while using mostly RF's now. It's a fine camera btw - you should try one (expect the mirror twisting wimpy arms, it comes down almost to Leica M size, when stripped off it's motor, shot with small prism and attached to a nice 50).
 
Recently I had two women in a convertible pull up to me, the driver told me that she really liked my camera. It was the Leica M8.

I don't think she would have stopped for the Black Canonet. But I'm still keeping both of them.

Nikki uses the M3, SP, and M8. Been using the first two since she was 4.
 
Today I took a few pictures in 'stealth mode' 🙄 I used a Leica and 50 mm Summicron and was very gentle so as not to knock the subject. I was photographing vines and early ripening grapes. They turned out to be a right bunch - not one bit of sweetness in any of them. I wish now I'd had a camera in which the shutter sounded like two dustbin lids banging together. The owner apologised to me for 'raisin' my hopes, she could see that I was not 'berry' happy.

Still I respected the subject and quietly closed the vinery door on the way out and slipped away. No doubt they will be wining before too long 😀
 
Puns? What puns Paul? 😉

If people don't think I'm taking this stealth stuff seriously, then lookee here: not a person is looking at me 'cause they can't see me - how's that for stealth!

Riotous_Scrum.jpg


on the other hand getting caught can be humorous:-

5940861482_15765389fc_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
My ancedotal experience is from this past tuesday shooting the fire in San Francisco. I was able to shoot the entire event, brushing shoulders with the fireman, I believe because my camera looked unprofessional (or is it because it looked SO professional hah). I saw a handful of DSLR users contained about 50 feet back, which doesnt prove anything but I do speculate if there is a correlation. I was there for I dont know how long, but far long enough for them to have moved me. For some reason, they let me stay in the action until the fire was out, then a cop came and said I needed to move back. TOO LATE BUDDY ! 🙂
 
My ancedotal experience is from this past tuesday shooting the fire in San Francisco. I was able to shoot the entire event, brushing shoulders with the fireman, I believe because my camera looked unprofessional (or is it because it looked SO professional hah). I saw a handful of DSLR users contained about 50 feet back, which doesnt prove anything but I do speculate if there is a correlation. I was there for I dont know how long, but far long enough for them to have moved me. For some reason, they let me stay in the action until the fire was out, then a cop came and said I needed to move back. TOO LATE BUDDY ! 🙂

Excellent; I like the 'Fireman Portrait' picture - well done.
 
Puns? What puns Paul? 😉

If people don't think I'm taking this stealth stuff seriously, then lookee here: not a person is looking at me 'cause they can't see me - how's that for stealth!

Riotous_Scrum.jpg


on the other hand getting caught can be humorous:-

5940861482_15765389fc_b.jpg

Are you sure? The guy on the second floor looks like he just might have noticed your camera.lol
 
Back
Top Bottom