The Beauty And The Beast - M5 meets MP

Bully

Established
Local time
7:22 AM
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
88
Location
Germany
Hello friends!

After purchasing a misaligned CL a few weeks ago i gave it back and took the chance to catch the big brother of it, the legendary M5.
I took a few pictures with it and i have to say, i am completely impressed!

What a great camera to use, and the best: it looks really great. Yes folks, it is elegant!

Bully
 
Yes, the M5 is a beautiful and elegant camera. Match needle metering, with very good visual indication of +/- exposure (not stupid glaring LED's), very nice ergonomics for medium to large hands, stunningly well balanced for a Noctilux, and reputation of the highest of Leitz craftsmanship.

It is a shame that it was never made in black paint.

Vick
 
The beauty and the beast, hey? Since the M5 is the beauty....

Just funning. Welcome aboard. The hardest thing I found about the first M5 I bought: Paying for the second M5 I bought.

Enjoy!
 
Vickko said:
Yes, the M5 is a beautiful and elegant camera. Match needle metering, with very good visual indication of +/- exposure (not stupid glaring LED's), very nice ergonomics for medium to large hands, stunningly well balanced for a Noctilux, and reputation of the highest of Leitz craftsmanship.

It is a shame that it was never made in black paint.

Vick

The M5 should be well balanced with the Noctilux 🙂 If it only would work with the Super-Angulon-M (without modification of the lens) ... 😱
 
LHSA MP3 on left with 35mm Summilux; M5 on right with "The Beast". Both with black Luigi cases.

/T
 

Attachments

  • MP&M5_0015.JPG
    MP&M5_0015.JPG
    87.9 KB · Views: 0
  • MP&M5_0018.JPG
    MP&M5_0018.JPG
    62.9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
There were/are some nice things about the M5; the shutter speed dial and the readout were really good. The flappy arm which sometimes rid itself of the photocell and the rewind weren't that good. At the time the M5 came out the Fuji films didn't have the lugs in the bottom of the spool, so they couldn't be used in the camera.

They soon fixed the stupid vertical hang of the camera, or at least gave you a choice. The initial configuration made it very difficult to use multiple cameras. Multiple M5's _really _ didn't work as they constantly got in each other's way, and an M5 alongside an M4 didn't work that well either, since the feel and layout were too different and the strap thing made it worse.

All in all, it wasn't a thoroughly thought out and tested product. I went back to M4's.

Henning
 
Yeah I much prefer a vertical hang camera. But I guess its what you are used to. Just seems more logical to me to have the hardware hang that way.
 
M5 was my first M. It was followed by an M3, 4P, 6, CL, CLE. They're all gone but I still have the M5. It's a 3 lug but I carry it on the end lugs.
I should have kept the CLE also, but we all make mistakes sometime.
 
giellaleafapmu said:
Funny how things people don't like become instantly "stupid". One of the things I like best about the M5 is the vertical hang...

GLF

Please read the rest of the post. The problem lies with using multiple cameras. Try using a couple or three M5's at the same time. That's when the concept of 'stupid' arises.

Henning
 
Virtually every P&S camera in the 80s & 90s had the strap threaded through one end of the camera.

I suppose in a perfect world, a 4 lug M5 would be perfect. One hanging from each shoulder oriented so that it came up to your eye the right way and one around your neck in the middle. Hmmmmmmmmmm...reason enough to buy a 3rd M5 & send it to Sherry? 28-50-85 always at the ready?????????
 
Last edited:
Leica also made an everyready case that does the same thing. Bigfoot lives in one. Someday I'll find another one for Bubba.
 
Back
Top Bottom