ferider
Veteran
vrgard said:Is the Summarit really a Sonnar design? Cameraquest and others list it as a Xenon design. Sorry, but I don't know enough to know whether that answers the question or not. Anyone else know?
-Randy
It's not a Sonnar, Randy. And I would hope you see a difference between
Jaap's shots (eliptic OOF circles that make the OOF look like large rings around the focal area) and your Canon 50/1.5 photos.
Best from snowy Vermont,
Roland.
kross
sonnarism
hi,
pardon me but if u're looking for the 'King of Bokeh', it can be found with the legendary Minolta 135mm STF lens (now Sony
) on a 35mm SLR.....
it uses a double aperture blades for a Smooth Transition Focus(STF) resulting in 'non head spinning' or pleasing bokeh...
now.... is there a similar lens in the world of rangefinders?
cheers....
P.S. i'm new to rangefinder....still looking for a RF kit to kick start....
pardon me but if u're looking for the 'King of Bokeh', it can be found with the legendary Minolta 135mm STF lens (now Sony
it uses a double aperture blades for a Smooth Transition Focus(STF) resulting in 'non head spinning' or pleasing bokeh...
now.... is there a similar lens in the world of rangefinders?
cheers....
P.S. i'm new to rangefinder....still looking for a RF kit to kick start....
ampguy
Veteran
Last Nov. I took some some indoor photos (on my blog) with the Summarit @ 1.5 on an RD1, the bokeh is not as swirly as jaapv's first photo, so I wonder if there are different versions out there?
I think it's a great portrait lens, nice and sharp too (but you have to focus it ...)
I think it's a great portrait lens, nice and sharp too (but you have to focus it ...)
BJ Bignell
Je n'aurai plus peur
I love that type of swirly bokeh. I wish I had a lens that did the same...
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
ampguy said:Last Nov. I took some some indoor photos (on my blog) with the Summarit @ 1.5 on an RD1, the bokeh is not as swirly as jaapv's first photo, so I wonder if there are different versions out there?
I think it's a great portrait lens, nice and sharp too (but you have to focus it ...)
I have a LTM version. But the RD1 is 1.5 sensor and the M8 a 1.3, so there have been considerably more aberrations cropped out on the Epson. One would expect a "more tame"bokeh there.
SteveM(PA)
Poser
ampguy
Veteran
possible, but
possible, but
Even when I used it on an M4P, and other film M bodies, I never got swirlies like yours (which I think look cool). Could be I was just never at the same distances, lighting, focus as your shot though.
possible, but
Even when I used it on an M4P, and other film M bodies, I never got swirlies like yours (which I think look cool). Could be I was just never at the same distances, lighting, focus as your shot though.
jaapv said:I have a LTM version. But the RD1 is 1.5 sensor and the M8 a 1.3, so there have been considerably more aberrations cropped out on the Epson. One would expect a "more tame"bokeh there.
MartinP
Veteran
". . . Irony ? That's like woody or brassy - 'cept made out of iron. . . "
(Obligatory Baldrick/Blackadder joke, sorry ;o)
(Obligatory Baldrick/Blackadder joke, sorry ;o)
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
The truth you speakSteveM(PA) said:Among Yoda lovers not.![]()
trittium
Well-known
These are some of my photos with the summarit purposely shot out of focus. The bokeh is completely different. These were shot at f1.5



Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.