the cl crapped out today...

back alley

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
10:52 AM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,288
Location
true north strong & free
View My Gallery
bummer!

i had a workshop downtown all day today, so at lunch, i took the cl with 28 for a walk. took some shots, changed a roll of film and soon after the camera died.
the meter stalk is hitting the shutter curtain and needs 'help' back to the return position. the shutter is jammed also unless i do my hit the camera against the workbench trick.

should i send it off to kinderman for repair or just buy that m4-p that's for sale here?
the m4-p was my first leica...sold it a long time ago...

damn.
 
personally, I'd go for the M4-P.. the CL is a great little camera, and the built-in meter is nice.. but it's not quite the same thing

any idea what repairing the CL will run?
 
Hi Joe,

You could always buy the M4-P and repair the CL😉 But funds are always limited :bang: and you seem to like your CL *a lot*. In fact, I don't anyone who likes CL's as much. So, I think, even if you buy the M4-P, you 'll end up repairing the CL (not by your own I hope 😱 ). What's the alternative anyway? Send it to the landfill? No way.

Best,
 
Maybe ask kinderman how much for a meterectomy and use it as a pure manual body? Though I agree that the M4-P is probably the better bet long run.

William
 
back alley said:
alkis, i still have another cl so i would not be without one.
i could keep this one for parts (that's me looking on the bright side)

joe
Click to expand...

Ah, right, that makes sense Joe. I understand that parts are not easy to find. Well that M4-P sure looks nice 😉

Alkis
 
That's some lousy news about the CL Joe. I noticed that M4-P body too. It looks to be a great deal. I was actually considering it myself as I am starting to think about a second body to go along with my M4. But I don't really have the money right now. And I'm also in the market for a TLR. But I digress...

Anyway, I'm sure that you would enjoy using the M4-P. But it's not really a second body to anything you already have. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't get it. But if you have the $550 now, why not sell the 90 and maybe something else and put all the proceeds towards that black ZI that you have been wanting. Just a thought. (Honestly, I am not trying to ratchet you up here. 🙂 )
 
That does suck. The CL is a great little package. You have quite a move, all your bodies have built in meters and moving to a M4-P brings in the no-meter issue. Not a big deal for some, deal breakers for others. You have a L and a ZI which makes me question the M4-P (it's about the same). WHne I look at the CL, I think pocketable camera. Now you throw on a 28/1.9 and you get questions like, is that a camera in your pocket or are you happy to see me? If size is an issue, get the CL fixed.

Taking size out of the mix, do you want a carry everywhere camera, get a L CV 25/4 combo, but it's not the same quality as the CL. Great choice, but not the same.

A used M6 classic or M5? Now the M5 gets you into the same era, but might be more robust. The M6 classic gets you into more bucks, so why not get another ZI? There is something to having the same body. Perhaps a new ZI SW could fit the bill. Price sounds right in line with fixing CL or new M4P.

My heart says send the CL in for TLC to the best and love her for many years to come. My head says I do not know enough about your shooting style to make a strong recomendation.

My 2 cents.

B2 (;->
 
BillBingham2 said:
That does suck. The CL is a great little package. You have quite a move, all your bodies have built in meters and moving to a M4-P brings in the no-meter issue. Not a big deal for some, deal breakers for others. You have a L and a ZI which makes me question the M4-P (it's about the same). WHne I look at the CL, I think pocketable camera. Now you throw on a 28/1.9 and you get questions like, is that a camera in your pocket or are you happy to see me? If size is an issue, get the CL fixed.

Taking size out of the mix, do you want a carry everywhere camera, get a L CV 25/4 combo, but it's not the same quality as the CL. Great choice, but not the same.

A used M6 classic or M5? Now the M5 gets you into the same era, but might be more robust. The M6 classic gets you into more bucks, so why not get another ZI? There is something to having the same body. Perhaps a new ZI SW could fit the bill. Price sounds right in line with fixing CL or new M4P.

My heart says send the CL in for TLC to the best and love her for many years to come. My head says I do not know enough about your shooting style to make a strong recomendation.

My 2 cents.

B2 (;->
Click to expand...

the reality is i could easily live with what i have right now.
i don't need another camera unless the second cl dies on me.
i like shooting without a meter, in fact, it's almost like shooting with the zi on ae, i just point, compose, focus and shoot. i have a handheld (glad i kept one now) and use it sparingly with a meterless body.
sending it off to kinderman for a look-see will cost me 40 bucks plus shipping so i imagine i will eventually pack it up and see what's really wrong with it.
the m4-p is tempting because it's there, right now.
 
Yeah, you have to fix the CL. What caused the problem anyway? Seems weird that it would do this all of a sudden. Does it have to do with mounting the 28? (I'm sure that's not it, but thought I'd ask. If the meter flag was down, i.e. shutter wound, when the lens was mounted, I suppose it could have been bumped some.)
 
not sure what caused it.
it was working fine today and this past weekend also.
it's a very smooth camera, seems well maintained.
the advance stuck, i took off the lens and the meter stalk was just there half way into position and pressing against the shutter curtain.
i moved it back into place and hit the shutter release and it fired. but then after advancing the film again, it repeated the same thing.
 
Hi Joe,

This is what I would do WRT the CL: if the photocell is good and strong, I'd send the CL in for an overhaul and hopefully it will be good for a long time, or even allow you to sell it as a recently serviced item with good photocell (getting rare).

If the photocell is dying, then I'm not sure I'd fix it unless you really had a need for a compact M body with no meter.
 
that's a good sign on the meter.

that's a good sign on the meter.

fwiw, Sherry Krauter did a wonderful overhaul on my CL, it was around 2 bills, but worth it. Also, she won't charge for examining it and giving an estimate.

back alley said:
the meter in both cl's work great.
i need to talk with the former owner about recent servicing history.
Click to expand...
 
back alley said:
not sure what caused it.
it was working fine today and this past weekend also.
it's a very smooth camera, seems well maintained.
the advance stuck, i took off the lens and the meter stalk was just there half way into position and pressing against the shutter curtain.
i moved it back into place and hit the shutter release and it fired. but then after advancing the film again, it repeated the same thing.
Click to expand...
I'm sure it has nothing to do with your propensity for smacking it against things 😀
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Did Nikon really blow Leitz and Zeiss out of the water in 1950? Not quite, but....
Replies
9
Views
1K
aoresteen
aoresteen
J
35mm Still-Picture Photography: It began with scale focusing cameras! Back To Basics. Part 1, From the first to half-frame 35s of then and now.
Replies
10
Views
879
Jason Schneider
J
J
  • Article Article
Who invented the Leica M3 and IIIg? Two great men at Leitz Wetzlar! Both projects were team efforts led by innovative engineering geniuses.
Replies
13
Views
590
Ljós
L
J
  • Article Article
The Most Advanced 35mm Rangefinder Cameras Ever. Part 1: Leicas
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
johnf04
J
J
  • Article Article
The Pentax Papers, part 1, 1919 to 1973: From the founding of Asahi Optical Co. to the last screw-mount Pentax
2
Replies
26
Views
5K
Jason Schneider
J
Back
Top Bottom