menthel
Not very good...
Sorry for this, just a question really? Which one do people prefer? The full or the crop? I prefer the crop at present but some advice/discussion/critique would be great.
Full

TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
Crop

TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35-2.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
Full

TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
Crop

TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35-2.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
paulfish4570
Veteran
the crop, and i'd crop some asphalt, right up to the bottom of the curb to make her bigger ...
menthel
Not very good...
Thanks Paul, will give it a go!
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
I would think the crop. I would go further than Paul and suggest cropping down to about the height of the fence. That would even make her loom larger yet and still convey the background with less distraction. That is just me though.
Bob
Bob
robbeiflex
Well-known
I prefer the crop in this case, as it cuts out a few needless objects around the periphery that draw my eyes away from the subject.
Cheers,
Rob
Cheers,
Rob
FrankS
Registered User
Try a square crop, with the woman on the left third of the frame.
BobYIL
Well-known
Full... it's more "complete".. and there is nothing to bother my eyes in the frame, why crop? Also the poster of the lady there is a complementary element..
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
I have to go against the grain here.
The full frame has more point of interest that is missing in the crop.
I say full frame, print it big and hang it proudly on your wall
The full frame has more point of interest that is missing in the crop.
I say full frame, print it big and hang it proudly on your wall
huntjump
Well-known
hmmm. I might suggest cropping on the left side just up until the pole is gone. Then crop a bit above down to the top of the board where the warhol-like posters loom (like you did), but leave more on the right side. Or, leave in the pole but try cropping a tad bit of the bottom road to preserve the wide shot. Hard to say, but if its between the two above I liked the full for some reason.
Edit: didnt like the pole at first, but it might be the reason i'm not liking the crop. hah
Edit: didnt like the pole at first, but it might be the reason i'm not liking the crop. hah
Fawley
Well-known
Full Frame. For me the woman is not the subject. The street scene is the subject. The woman and the wall are complimentary and you need most of the pavement to balance the wall.
curmudgeon
Member
I would not crop it much, if at all. In particular, I would keep the dark post on the left to balance the darkness of the woman's upper garment.
What I would do, however, is apply a horizontal correction* so the curb line and the top of the dark frame are parallel with the edges of the the image. Oblique angles are fine, but this one is close enough to head on that I find the slight angles distracting.
* in the darkroom I would tilt the printing easel. In Lightroom I would use the horizontal correction.
What I would do, however, is apply a horizontal correction* so the curb line and the top of the dark frame are parallel with the edges of the the image. Oblique angles are fine, but this one is close enough to head on that I find the slight angles distracting.
* in the darkroom I would tilt the printing easel. In Lightroom I would use the horizontal correction.
Jubb Jubb
Well-known
another one for full frame.
Sparrow
Veteran
... the crop is the better image. The road markings, kerb-edge and bollard take the eye over to the left and makes a feature of the light L shaped area of sky at the top LH corner ... which is of course distracting from the intended subject ... the crop avoids a lot of the problems, but if I had to use that image I'd probably crop closer and do a bit of work on the contrast too
Sparrow
Veteran
menthel
Not very good...
Thanks all. I ran out of steam last night and so didn't get back to this! I will try various crops as suggested to see which pleases my eye most. I will print out a few as well (inkjet unfortunately) and see what works off the screen as well!
menthel
Not very good...
I don't mind at all. Its more striking with the contrast upped but loses some of the subtlety. More food for thought!
menthel
Not very good...
A few more based on some of the suggestions, I know which one I like most...

Saved Photos-21 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-22 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-23 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-24 by menthel, on Flickr
All prepared in Snapseed on my iPad, a cracking little program!

Saved Photos-21 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-22 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-23 by menthel, on Flickr

Saved Photos-24 by menthel, on Flickr
All prepared in Snapseed on my iPad, a cracking little program!
menthel
Not very good...
oftheherd
Veteran
I find the full frame more interesting as apparently you mind/eye did when you snapped this. The upper left is a little bright and maybe should be burned in. I like the entire scene. As mentioned above, the subject is the enture street scene. I also believe by going full frame, you reduce the notice of the blur on the woman's face and hand. It's not bad, but the closer you get, the more I find it distracting. I really like including the posters and the art work on the walls. Great stuff.
Just my two cents. It's your photo, do it how you like it best.
Just my two cents. It's your photo, do it how you like it best.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Yes, that is much much better.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.