The Last New DSLR? Would you believe the Pentax KF?

The Last New DSLR Ever? It’s Probably the Pentax KF!

Unveiled in ‘22 this upgraded Pentax K-70 may be the last of the breed

By Jason Schneider

The year 2022 marked the decisive moment at which the Mirrorless camera or EVC (electronic viewfinder camera) totally eclipsed the once mighty DSLR as the dominant category among interchangeable lens digital cameras. Indeed, the Pentax KF, was the only new DSLR introduced in 2022, an attractive, modestly upgraded replacement for the popular APS-C-format Pentax K-70. The K-mount Pentax KF added a higher-res 1.04m-Dot articulated LCD and slightly revised internals that reduced its body weight by a teensy 0.1 ounces. But how ever meager its improvements, the sleek, stylish enthusiast-aimed Pentax KF may earn its place in history as the last new DSLR in the world.

The rise and ultimate victory of the mirrorless EVC was made possible by perfecting its signature feature, the electronic viewfinder (EVF). The OLED EVFs in the current crop of mirrorless EVCs deliver a viewing experience that equals, and in many ways surpasses, the optical viewfinders (OVFs) in the best DSLRs—a brilliant ultra-hi-res image in impressively vibrant and accurate color and presented at a high enough refresh rate to ensure a seamless viewing experience equal to the best OVFs. These EVFs also provide superior performance in low light by upping the gain, giving a brighter, clearer view of the subject. Also trending among mirrorless EVCs, are larger eyepieces with higher-magnification OLED EVFs to enhance viewing and composition.

Mirrorless EVCs have numerous other advantages both operational and physical. By eliminating the large and costly pentaprism and mirror box assembly, they can be made smaller and lighter than comparable DSLRs and have inherently greater flexibility in terms of form factor, resulting in many compact, elegant designs with more ergonomic controls. And of course, by eliminating the flipping mirror, a major source of camera-induced shake, they let you capture sharper images, with or without image stabilization, when shooting handheld at slower shutter speeds. Not surprisingly the current crop of mirrorless EVCs benefits from state-of-the-art technology that delivers impressive dynamic ranges, upgraded image stabilization specs, remarkable maximum full-res framing rates, vastly expanded ISO ranges, ultra-hi-res EVFs and LCDs, pro-caliber video parameters, and a host of other advanced AI-based features. However rather than extol the advantages of the triumphant EVCs, let’s do a quick rundown on the evolution of the DSLR, the camera type that laid the groundwork and provided the basis for today’s most advanced interchangeable lens digital cameras.

The World’s first DSLR: The Electro-Optic Camera

This tethered 1-megapixel beauty was designed and constructed by Eastman Kodak Co. under a U.S. Government contract in 1987 and 1988 and was inspired by Kodak’s Microtechnology Division (MTD) having announced the development of the first megapixel CCD in 1986. In 1987 a government customer asked Kodak’s Federal Systems Division (FSD) to build a new camera based on the new CCD. According to the lead engineer Jim McGarvey it was a “true skunk works project, with a very small team led by Ken Cupery the project manager, assisted by MTD engineer Bill Toohey, who designed the CCD analog circuitry, and technician Tom McCarthy, who assembled the whole system.” Mc Garvey continues, “…the customer preferred Canon film cameras, so I chose the beautiful and rugged New F-1 body, modifying the original door to attach the new CCD back, which was milled out of a solid aluminum block, with 3 small Allen screws used to adjust the focal plane of the CCD.
Three external LEDs to the left of the finder eyepiece indicate the status of the digital system.”

The first DSLR, the Elecrto-Optic Camera by Eastman Kodak Co..jpg
The first DSLR, the Elecrto-Optic Camera by Eastman Kodak Co. was tethered. Camera body is based on the Canon F-1.

Since the camera was intended for unobtrusive use, the CCD was mounted in a small addition to the back of a standard 35mm camera body, and the rest of the system was stuffed into a box connected to the camera with a thin ribbon cable, all of which fit into a normal shoulder bag. The Electro-Optic Camera project led to the Hawkeye II marketed to government customers, and in 1991 to the first commercial DSLRs, the Kodak DCS cameras by Kodak Professional Digital Camera System. This culminated in the Nikon D1 of 1999, the first professional DSLR to successfully challenge Kodak’s then-total dominance of the DSLR market.

Kodak early DSLR based on on Canon F-1 body.jpg
Open back of Kodak's groundbreaking SLR shows standard Canon F-1 body with CCD sensor in handmade digital back.

Over the next decade from 2000 to 2010, the DSLR category vastly expanded, and the DSLR quickly became the undisputed leader of the crucial pro and serious enthusiast consumer demographics. Manufacturers then entering the new, fiercely competitive DSLR market include Canon, Minolta (later Konica Minolta) Fujifilm, Sony, Pentax, Olympus, Sigma, and Kodak, all of which brought forth a profusion of broad spectrum and high-end pro/enthusiast models.
  • In January 2000, Fujifilm announced the FinePix S, its first consumer-level DSLR.
  • In November 2001 Canon released its first pro-caliber DSLR, the 4.1MP EOS-1D, and in 2003, unveiled the 6.3 MP EOS 300D (aha the Digital Rebel), the first DSLR with an MSRP under $1,000 ($999.00 to be exact).
Canon_EOS-1D.jpg
Canon EOS-1D: Canon's first top-of-the-line pro DSLR
  • In 2002 Nikon announced the very successful Nikon D100, offering pro-caliber performance at a reasonable price, using a 6.3MP APS-C-format CCD sensor. It inspired other manufacturers and was instrumental in expanding and refining the emerging DSLR mass market
  • In 2004 Konica Minolta released the Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D, the first DSLR with in-body image stabilization, a feature soon adopted by Pentax, Olympus, and Sony.
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D with Sony DT 18-55mm f:3.5-5.6 SAM lens.jpg
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D was the first with in-body image stabilization, a feature widely adopted by other camera makers.
  • In early 2008 Nikon brought forth the D90, the first DSLR to feature video recording, a feature that soon became universal on all subsequent DSLRs.
Nikon D90 with Nikkor ED 18-55mm f:3.5-5.6 II lens.jpg
Nikon D90: The first DSLR with video capability, it was a trendsetter and virtually all DSLR that came after it could shoot video with sound.

During the 2010s, the major camera manufacturers began transitioning their product lines away from DSLRs to mirrorless EVC cameras. In September 2013, Olympus announced they would stop developing DSLRs to concentrate on mirrorless EVCs. In 2020 Nikon announced that they were terminating DSLR production in Japan, followed by similar announcements by Canon and Sony.

The Nikon D6: the last flagship DSLR

Nikon D6.jpg
The mighty Nikon D6 of 2020, most likely the last top-of-the line pro DSLR.

However, in 2020 Nikon announced a final gift to DSLR fans, its last top-of-the-line, pro-aimed DSLR, the glorious Nikon D6. Featuring a full frame 20.8MP CMOS sensor mated to a high-spec EXPEED 6 Image Processor, this rugged beauty provides a full-res burst rate of 14 fps, sensitivity settings from ISO 100-102,000, extendable to an amazing ISO 3,280,000, a Multi-CAM 37 K 105-zone All Cross-Type AF system that provides 17 customizable Group Area AF patterns, and UHD 4K video recording at 30, 25, and 24 fps. All this and much more is built into a robust body with a magnesium alloy chassis and comprehensive dust and moisture sealing to allow working under harsh conditions. Measuring 6.3 x 6.42 x 3.62 inches (W x H x D) and weighing in at a hefty 2,79 pounds (body only) the Nikon D6 is certainly an impressive finale to one of the great line of pro DSLRs going back to 1999, but understandably it’s premium priced at a cool $6,496.95 body only.

The Pentax KF: The Last new DSLR Ever?

Pentax KF with 18-55mm zoom, frint view.jpg
The Pentax KF, front view, with SMC PENTAX-DAL 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL WR. Lens and body are both water resistant.

While one well respected reviewer dismisses the Pentax KF as “…simply the Pentax K-70 APS-C-format DSLR with a few very minor tweaks, mostly made as a result of changes in component availability” the KF, which replaces the K-70 in Ricoh’s Pentax line, is nevertheless a, sleek, elegant high-performance camera that will surely meet or exceed the expectations of the serious enthusiasts that comprise its target audience. Its 24.24MP CMOS sensor is coupled to a PRIME MII high speed imaging engine, a combo enabling res burst rates up to 6 fps, ISO settings of 100-102400, and full HD 1080i video at 60 fps. Its 3.0-inch Vari-Angle LCD monitor has had its res bumped up to 1.03m-dots for clearer viewing, and its built-in sensor-shift Shake Reduction system uses a gyro sensor to provide a 4.5-stop anti-shake advantage in handheld shooting, and its SAFOX AF system pricvides 11 phase-detection points including 9mcross-type sensors and operated down to -3 EV for low light work. Other features: 3 new custom image modes, Satobi, Bleach Bypass, and Cross Processing plus special Kyushu and Katen modes accessible with specific lenses, a Pixel Shift Resolution System that captures 4 images, each shifted by one pixel, and combines them into a single more detailed, higher resolution image,, comprehensive wireless, functionality, and dustproof, weatherproof construction using 100 seals throughout the body that also deliver outstanding cold-proof performance down to -14°F.

Pentax KF rear view showing articulated LCD, readouts .jpg
Back view of Pentax KF shows ergonomic control layout, articulated higher-res LCD with readouts, in storage position against body.

Bottom line: While the Pentax KF, the camera most likely to be the very last new DSLR brought to market is not a splendiferous flagship camera like the Nikon D6 of 2020, the decades-long saga of the DSLR has not ended with a whimper because the Pentax KF is beautiful camera and worthy contender in the broad-spectrum enthusiast class, and at $846.95 (body only) it’s also an outstanding value.
Canon EOS-1D, Canon's first top-of-the line pro DSLR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was quite happy with my D700 until it lunched its shutter. They were the ultimate prosumer dslr when they came out in my opinion.

It is my most used camera today. The models that followed it don't have the look of that camera (or the D3). I have four. They're cheap. I may buy more. In the optimistic belief that I outlive them all.
 
I think you have not experience a good EVF because it certainly is fast enough for street photography.

Based on what I have seen of yours, any EVF is good. For you. 🙂

My observations and opinion: a good street photographer doesn’t really use the viewfinder. Both eyes are open to allow continuous viewing of the scene. The reason for raising the camera to the eye (and sometimes you don’t do even that) is so the camera will have the same perspective and view of the scene that you are seeing with your eye.

OVF, EVF doesn‘t matter. There’s a reason Speed Graphics also have an extendable wire frame.

This is only my opinion, since I am not a street photographer. But I have photographed many streets.
 
The DSLR market is way down from a few years ago, and not long ago Pentax held a small ~5% of that market. Maybe they figure with Nikon and Canon putting more resources into MILC line-ups, those that want to stick with a DSLR will look at them. The main problem with switching mounts is the investment in lenses. I'm happy with my Nikon Df for a DSLR, and very happy with the Z5. Also happy with the Leica M9. In a few years, I suspect a MILC will satisfy both requirements as it can use all of my lenses.

If Pentax picks up market share- they could afford the NRE for coming out with a new digital camera. But at the present sales levels, hard to see how they could cover the NRE of developing a major new DSLR.
there is a "run" on pre owned Z5's. I'd like one also, but I also like good deals more. I would also like a F6...is that a DSLR? 🙂
 
My observations and opinion: a good street photographer doesn’t really use the viewfinder. Both eyes are open to allow continuous viewing of the scene. The reason for raising the camera to the eye (and sometimes you don’t do even that) is so the camera will have the same perspective and view of the scene that you are seeing with your eye.

OVF, EVF doesn‘t matter. There’s a reason Speed Graphics also have an extendable wire frame.

This is only my opinion, since I am not a street photographer. But I have photographed many streets.

Your opinion is right on the money as far as I'm concerned.

All the best,
Mike
 
The DP1 is waiting for you.
I looked around the other day to see if there was any on eBay etc and was stunned to discover that people are asking twice what they were worth new here in Oz when I considered getting one. They have obviously become a bit of a cult camera! 😳
 
I looked around the other day to see if there was any on eBay etc and was stunned to discover that people are asking twice what they were worth new here in Oz when I considered getting one. They have obviously become a bit of a cult camera! 😳

You have a Sigma SD1 Merrill... everything else is puppy poop compare to that! When you've got the best, you can forget all the rest.

All the best,
Mike
 
I think you have not experience a good EVF because it certainly is fast enough for street photography.

Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
 
Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
If he’s shooting that quickly, then just just how much time is he spending looking through the viewfinder of his M4?

A lot of his shots are skewed, showing how he just raised the camera for an instant and tripped the shutter. Lens prefocused. A fair number of photos aren’t even at eye level. It’s not like he’s spending any time at all composing, but rather just making sure the subject is in the frame.

For sports photography, like basketball, I’d want a great EVF if I had to use one.
 
Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
An EVF does not have to be a barrier to fast shooting. Even the Nikon 1V1 already featured capturing shots before plus after the shutter button was pressed and allowed the selection of the best shot. And that's 2014 tech; ancient by today's standard.

That said, an optical viewfinder (like on the M4) is still a joy and comfort to use.
 
Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
If you are shooting fast and loose like Winogrand in today's day and age you would be using the rear LCD. No one can convince me Winogrand wouldn't have discreetly framed that way. He was looking for a way not to be noticed with the camera up to his eye.
 
If you are shooting fast and loose like Winogrand in today's day and age you would be using the rear LCD. No one can convince me Winogrand wouldn't have discreetly framed that way. He was looking for a way not to be noticed with the camera up to his eye.
If I tore my library apart, I could find the article where I read this. But I do remember that Winogrand was once asked in a workshop if he often shot without using the viewfinder; he replied emphatically that he always used the viewfinder.
 
It is mentioned here

 
Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
I have to disagree. I am completely aware of how he photographs and it is perfectly doable with any VF. I am not sure why you think an EVF cannot react fast. The technology would never have become the latest VF if it could not react. As with any street photography, you learn to anticipate from doing it so much. Winogrand was certainly anticipating and since he used the same focal length most of the time, he knew what would be in his frame. Sometimes a slow moving subject is only in the right place for a split second too... and you need to react just as fast.
 
If I tore my library apart, I could find the article where I read this. But I do remember that Winogrand was once asked in a workshop if he often shot without using the viewfinder; he replied emphatically that he always used the viewfinder.
Oh I don't doubt he wanted to frame his shots well, not sloppily -- there's a difference between always using a viewfinder over a back screen, and always using a viewfinder because it's the only framing tool you've got. I don't by any means think Winogrand's composition and framing was loose. His 28mm shots are super effective at both what they include and what they leave out of the frame. But he also wanted to avoid people changing their behavior because of noticing him using the camera.
 
It is mentioned here

I carefully watched Garry as he was making photos. A few times he held the camera up to his eye for a few seconds, looking through the external viewfinder. But the overwhelming majority of the time he would bring the camera to his eye for about 1/10th of a second and trip the shutter. So in that brief moment he is only framing the shot.

I notice his style before the shot is to be moving the camera around a lot, playing with it, move the camera up and down, forward and back, flip it around, wind the shutter, make motions like he’s fumbling around with the camera , and then quickly make the shot. I think this is sort of an “active camouflage“ which eases the apprehensions of those around him: “oh, a harmless tourist”.

Would Garry Winogrand have liked a Pentax KF? Probably. He might have liked a digital Leica more. Either way, his bag would be filled with memory cards and batteries.
 
Last edited:
Depends on what kind of street photography you are doing.

EVF is fine for slow moving subjects and or still life.

But if you are shooting fast like Winogrand where you are yanking the camera up in a second or two and grabbing a shot you're going to be out of luck. There are some YouTube videos of him shooting that will give you an idea of how fast some of us shoot. Current EVF is not going to cut it.
Harry- after shooting RF's since I was 11 and SLR's since I was 12, picked up a Nikon Z5 a little over a month ago. I can get a shot in focus of a moving skater with the 90/1.5 wide-open under just the disco lights. Better hit rate than the M9 and much better than the Df. I also use the Canon 50/0.95 on it. The frame-rate update keeps up with the action and my continuous focus, and the latency is less than the Df. Compared to the Olympus EP2 with EVF, a world apart. The Ep2- slow update and 0.2sec or more of latency. The new mirrorless generation- has caught up.


I shot some 300 pictures on this outing, most were in good focus. Much higher hit rate than my Df or M9/M Monochrom.
 
Back
Top Bottom