jsrockit
Moderator
Misunderstood? Huh? Not on RFF at least.
I suspect that had it been more reasonably priced it would have sold in considerable numbers.
But not rangefinder cameras...Utterly debatable. Monochrome cameras have been in service in the security and defense camera industry for ages.
I actually can't see too much being spent on developing the MM...Leica just removed the bayer and IR filter and put a piece of optical glass there instead, right?
Is that so? I guess that Phsase One is a profiteering company then🙄The point is that monochrome cameras are inherently simpler to develop and operate. The color interpolation algorithm is what complicates the bulk of camera processing and a major source of image artifacts such as moire. Developing a sensor that does not need color is a no-brainer. I'm not even sure what Leica's issues were when it came to developing a monochrome camera. Sensor manufacturing costs are even lower with one less layer to overlay on the sensor. The only possible reason why the camera is so expensive is probably because Leica ordered a much smaller batch of sensors and thus driving up the price by a few times.
Maybe they should have hired you then for this project. Based on an interview with Kaufmann:
"The black and white project devoured tens of millions of euros and tied one and a half years, a large part of the development team - a daring undertaking for the small company."
and:
"Kaufmann had hoped to 3500 units per year to sell, in fact there are about three times as many."
source
So tens of millions in R&D, while expecting to sell only 10 pieces a day explains a lot about the final price of the MM.
What? Sensor size scales with costs exponentially, and a low production part scales up even more? As it is, a medium format sensor will have a higher rejection rate than a 35mm sensor.Is that so? I guess that Phsase One is a profiteering company then🙄
The IQ 260 Achromatic costs 10.000 $ more than the colour IQ 260…
Small series special development cameras simply cost more to produce.
As it is the premium Leica charges is quite modest, I suspect the margin on the Monochrom is more narrow than on the M or ME.
What? Sensor size scales with costs exponentially, and a low production part scales up even more? As it is, a medium format sensor will have a higher rejection rate than a 35mm sensor.
Heck, even CMOSIS has sensors with options for a Bayer filter array or no Bayer filter array. Take a look at this webpage: http://www.cmosis.com/products/standard_products/cmv12000
Same Sensor, but options for color and mono. Honestly, I think Leica is just giving a sorry excuse for even spending so much money on research for a "monochrome" sensor when that same sensor is likely to be available in color and mono. Either that, or pure incompetence.
Ok. I understand. Both Leica and Phase One are incompetents ripping the public off….🙄 Thank you for your insight.What? Sensor size scales with costs exponentially, and a low production part scales up even more? As it is, a medium format sensor will have a higher rejection rate than a 35mm sensor.
Heck, even CMOSIS has sensors with options for a Bayer filter array or no Bayer filter array. Take a look at this webpage: http://www.cmosis.com/products/standard_products/cmv12000
Same Sensor, but options for color and mono. Honestly, I think Leica is just giving a sorry excuse for even spending so much money on research for a "monochrome" sensor when that same sensor is likely to be available in color and mono. Either that, or pure incompetence.
Some of my own words and images over at Steve Huff from back in Oct.
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2013/10/22/almost-a-year-with-the-leica-monochrom-by-alan-bourgeois/
Some great ones in there! Particularly the 2nd and 4th image.