"What matters to most of those collectors is winning. When art becomes a competitive sport,"
"all it takes to win is the guts and the money to go further than anyone else, and then, voila, you win. And winning feels really good."
You could drop that pic into our gallery and it probabaly wouldn't muster a comment ... someone is wrong here and I don't think it's us!
Is it time to once again resurrect that classic parody of internet comments about iconic photographs?
You could drop that pic into our gallery and it probabaly wouldn't muster a comment ... someone is wrong here and I don't think it's us!
As to Tuna's original post; it seems to me that we all seem to spend more time rolling our eyes at ludicrous auction prices for art than rubbing our hands with glee ( or at least some reaction somewhere between the two ) at the thought that there are people with money out there willing to pay for pretty, interesting, mundane, obvious, 'out-there' etc photographs. Maybe some of us that are currently selling pictures at £500 will one day find we can sell a print for £1M+....most likely not but there's always a chance and the fact that there is any interest at all, surely, is a good thing for photography and photographers?
Moderators: please delete if I am in violation of rules.
I am really fed up with the constant bashing of contemporary fine art on this forum. It just doesn't stop.
Cindy Sherman is probably the most important photographer in fine art in the past forty years. She has been exhibited everywhere, written about voluminously, collected voraciously.
And yet she's talked about here like she's someone with a Flickr account who just happened to scam some fool into paying $4million for a snapshot.
Too many threads with people passing judgment on things they really don't understand...very boring...
Moderators: please delete if I am in violation of rules.
I am really fed up with the constant bashing of contemporary fine art on this forum. It just doesn't stop.
Cindy Sherman is probably the most important photographer in fine art in the past forty years. She has been exhibited everywhere, written about voluminously, collected voraciously.
And yet she's talked about here like she's someone with a Flickr account who just happened to scam some fool into paying $4million for a snapshot.
Too many threads with people passing judgment on things they really don't understand...very boring...
So what's a "colour coupler print"? Art speak for your average fuji archive paper? I thought all neg to pos colour prints use color couplers. Sounds expensive, it must be good then. I'l have three please.
Moderators: please delete if I am in violation of rules.
I am really fed up with the constant bashing of contemporary fine art on this forum. It just doesn't stop.
Cindy Sherman is probably the most important photographer in fine art in the past forty years. She has been exhibited everywhere, written about voluminously, collected voraciously.
And yet she's talked about here like she's someone with a Flickr account who just happened to scam some fool into paying $4million for a snapshot.
Too many threads with people passing judgment on things they really don't understand...very boring...
Moderators: please delete if I am in violation of rules.
I am really fed up with the constant bashing of contemporary fine art on this forum. It just doesn't stop.
Cindy Sherman is probably the most important photographer in fine art in the past forty years. She has been exhibited everywhere, written about voluminously, collected voraciously.
And yet she's talked about here like she's someone with a Flickr account who just happened to scam some fool into paying $4million for a snapshot.
Too many threads with people passing judgment on things they really don't understand...very boring...
Maybe some of us that are currently selling pictures at £500 will one day find we can sell a print for £1M+....most likely not but there's always a chance and the fact that there is any interest at all, surely, is a good thing for photography and photographers?